When two three-letter words are flashed up in sequence, observers cannot tell whether the top halves of the words are the same or different. It follows that words, like faces, are processed holistically, not as a set of separate features.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CaramazzaAHillisA E, 1990“Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient”Nature346267–269
2.
ColtheartMCurtisBAtkinsPHellerM, 1993“Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches”Psychological Review100589–608
3.
DamasioA R, 1983“Pure alexia”Trends in Neurosciences693–96
4.
DamasioA R, 1985“Prosopagnosia”Trends in Neurosciences8132–135
5.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117
6.
FarahM JTanakaJ NDrainM, 1995“What causes the face inversion effect?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21628–634
7.
FarahM JWilsonK DDrainMTanakaJ N, 1998“What is ‘special’ about face perception?”Psychological Review105482–498
8.
FodorJ, 1983Modularity and Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
9.
GauthierICurranTCurbyK MCollinsD, 2003“Perceptual interference supports a nonmodular account of face processing”Nature Neuroscience6428–432
10.
GrossC GSergentJ, 1992“Face recognition”Current Opinion in Neurobiology2156–161
11.
McKoneEMartiniPNakayamaK J, 2001“Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27573–599
12.
MelaraR DAlgomD, 2003“Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects”Psychological Review110422–471
13.
MondlochC JLe GrandRMaurerD, 2002“Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing”Perception31553–566
14.
MoscovitchMWinocurGBerhmannM, 1997“What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience9555–564
15.
NakayamaK, 2001“Modularity in perception: its relation to cognition and knowledge”, Blackwell Handbook of Perception Ed. GoldsteinE B (Oxford UK: Malden, MA: Blackwell) pp 737–759
16.
PellicanoERhodesG, 2003“Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults”Psychological Science14618–622
17.
SinhaPPoggioT, 1996“I think I know that face”Nature384404
18.
StroopJ R, 1935“Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions”Journal of Experimental Psychology18643–662
19.
TanakaJ NFarahM J, 1993“Parts and wholes in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology A46225–245