We investigated developmental changes in sensitivity to biological motion by asking 6-year-olds, 9-year-olds, and adults (twenty-four in each group) to discriminate point-light biological motion displays depicting one of a variety of human movements from scrambled versions of the same displays. When tested without noise dots, participants at all ages performed near ceiling levels and no differences in accuracy were found among the three age groups. Age differences emerged in the second task, in which we used a staircase procedure to determine threshold values of the number of noise dots that could be tolerated in producing a percentage correct value corresponding to a d' value of 1.4. Sensitivity to biological motion improved linearly with age (p < 0.01), with 6-year-olds performing significantly more poorly than adults. This immature performance contrasts with adult-like accuracy by 4 years of age for sensitivity to global motion (Parrish et al, 2005 Vision Research45 827–837). The comparison implies an immaturity at 6 years of age in the neural networks involved specifically in the processing of biological motion, networks that may include the superior temporal sulcus (STS).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarclayC DCuttingJ EKozlowskiL T, 1978“Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception”Perception & Psychophysics23145–152
2.
BeauchampM SLeeK EHaxbyJ VMartinA, 2002“Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements”Neuron34149–159
3.
BeauchampM SLeeK EHaxbyJ VMartinA, 2003“fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience15991–1001
BertenthalB IProffittD RCuttingJ E, 1984“Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology37213–230
7.
BertenthalB IProffittD RKramerS J, 1982“Perception of biomechanical motion by infants: Implementation of various processing constraints”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13577–585
8.
BertenthalB IProffittD RSpetnerN BThomasM A, 1985“The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions”Child Development56531–543
9.
BlakeRTurnerL MSmoskiM JPozdolS LStoneW, 2003“Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism”Psychological Science14151–157
10.
BraddickO JO'BrienJ M DWattam-BellJAtkinsonJHartleyTTurnerR, 2001“Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion”Perception3061–72
CuttingJ EKozlowskiL T, 1977“Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society9353–356
13.
DittrichW H, 1993“Action categories and the perception of biological motion”Perception2215–22
14.
EllembergDLewisT LDirksMMaurerDLedgwayTGuillemotJ-PLeporeF, 2004“Putting order into the development of sensitivity to global motion”Vision Research442403–2411
15.
EllembergDLewisT LMaurerDBrarSBrentH P, 2002“Better perception of global motion after monocular than after binocular deprivation”Vision Research42169–179
16.
FoxRMcDanielC, 1982“The perception of biological motion by human infants”Science218486–487
17.
FreireALeeK, 2001“Face recognition in 4-to 7-year-olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology80347–371
18.
FriendM, 2000“Developmental changes in sensitivity to vocal paralanguage”Developmental Science3148–162
19.
FriendMBeckerJ B, 2000“A developmental bias in the interpretation of discrepant messages”Merrill Palmer Quarterly46342–369
20.
GiaschiDReganD, 1997“Development of motion-defined figure-ground segregation in preschool and older children, using a letter-identification task”Optometry and Vision Science74761–767
21.
GoldbergMMaurerDLewisT L, 2001“Developmental changes in attention: The effects of endogenous cueing and of distractors”Developmental Science4209–219
22.
GrossmanE D, 2005, “Evidence for a network of brain areas involved in perception of biological motion”, in Human Body Perception from the Inside Out Eds KnoblichGThorntonI MGrosjeanMShiffrarM (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 361–384
23.
GrossmanE DBlakeR, 1999“Perception of coherent motion, biological motion and form-from-motion under dim-light conditions”Vision Research393721–3727
24.
GrossmanE DBlakeR, 2001“Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion”Vision Research411475–1482
25.
GrossmanE DBlakeRKimC-Y, 2004“Learning to see biological motion: Brain activity parallels behavior”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience161–11
26.
GrossmanE DDonnellyMPriceRPickensDMorganVNeighborGBlakeR, 2000“Brain areas involved in the perception of biological motion”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience12711–720
27.
GunnACoryEAtkinsonJBraddickOWattam-BellJGuzzettaACioniG, 2002“Dorsal and ventral stream sensitivity in normal development and hemiplegia”Neuroreport13843–847
28.
JohanssonG, 1973“Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis”Perception & Psychophysics14201–211
29.
JordanHReissJ EHoffmanJ ELandauB, 2002“Intact perception of biological motion in the face of profound spatial deficits: Williams syndrome”Psychological Science13162–167
30.
KirkR E, 1989Statistics: An introduction (Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston)
31.
KovácsIKozmaPFeherABenedekG, 1999“Late maturation of visual spatial integration in humans”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA9612204–12209
32.
KozlowskiL TCuttingJ E, 1977“Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display”Perception & Psychophysics21575–580
33.
LewisT LEllembergDMaurerDDirksMWilkinsonFWilsonH R, 2004“A window on the normal development of sensitivity to global form in Glass patterns”Perception33409–418
34.
MaunsellJ H RNewsomeW T, 1987“Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex”Annual Review of Neuroscience10363–401
35.
MondlochC JGeldartSMaurerDLe GrandR, 2003a“Developmental changes in face processing skills”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology8667–84
36.
MondlochC JLe GrandRMaurerD, 2002“Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing”Perception31553–566
37.
MondlochC JLe GrandRMaurerD, 2003b“Early visual experience is necessary for the development of some-but-not-all aspects of face processing”, in The Development of Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood: Current Perspectives Eds PascalisOSlaterA (New York: Nova) pp 99–117
38.
van OostendeSSunaertSvan HeckePMarchalGOrbanG, 1997“The kinetic occipital (KO) region in man: an fMRI study”Cerebral Cortex7690–701
39.
ParrishE EGiaschiD EBodenCDoughertyR, 2005“The maturation of form and motion perception in school age children”Vision Research45827–837
40.
ParsonsL MFoxP T, 1998“The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape”Cognitive Neuropsychology15583–615
41.
PavlovaMKrägeloh-MannISokolovABirbaumerN, 2000“Simultaneous masking of a point-light walker in children”, in Fechner Day 2000 Ed. BonnetC (Strasbourg: ISP) pp 279–284
42.
PavlovaMKrägeloh-MannISokolovABirbaumerN, 2001“Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children”Perception30925–933
43.
PavlovaMStaudtMSokolovABirbaumerNKrägeloh-MannI, 2003“Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early periventricular brain lesions”Brain126692–701
44.
PelphreyK AMitchellT VMcKeownM JGoldsteinJAllisonTMcCarthyG, 2003“Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: Controlling for meaningful coherent motion”Journal of Neuroscience236819–6825
45.
PintoJ, 2005“Developing body representations: A review of infants' responses to biological motion displays”, in Human Body Perception from the Inside Out Eds KnoblichGThorntonI MGrosjeanMShiffrarM (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 305–322
46.
PuceAPerrettD, 2003“Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B358435–445
47.
StevenageS VNixonM SVinceK, 1999“Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity”Applied Cognitive Psychology13513–526
48.
TrojeN F, 2002“Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns”Journal of Vision2371–387
