We examined whether a face-inversion effect occurs when participants explore faces by touch. We used a haptic version of the inversion paradigm with 3-D clay facemasks and non-face control objects (teapots) moulded from real objects. Young, neurologically intact, blindfolded participants performed a temporally unconstrained haptic same/different task in each of four stimulus conditions: upright facemasks, inverted facemasks, upright teapots, and inverted teapots. There was a significant inversion effect for faces in terms of accuracy, but none for teapots. The results are considered in terms of the consequences of sequential manual exploration for haptic face processing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettJ CSearcyJ, 1993“Inversion and configuration of faces”Cognitive Psychology25281–316
2.
BentonA LSivanA Bde S HamsherKVarneyN RSpreenO, 1994Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment. A Clinical Manualsecond edition (New York: Oxford University Press)
3.
BergerCHatwellY, 1995“Developmental trends in haptic and visual free classifications: Influence of stimulus structure and exploration on decisional processes”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology6447–465
4.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition by components: A theory of image human understanding”Psychological Review94115–145
BruyerRCrispeelsG, 1992“Expertise in person recognition”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society30501–504
7.
CareySDiamondR, 1977“From piecemeal to configurational representation of face”Science195312–314
8.
CaseyS JNewellF N, 2005“The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition”Experimental Brain Research (Online June 2, 2005)
9.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117
10.
DuchaineBNakayamaK, 2005“Dissociations of face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17249–261
11.
FreireALeeKSymonsL A, 2000“The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence”Perception29159–170
12.
GauthierITarrM JAndersonA WSkudlarskiPGoreJ C, 1999“Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects”Nature Neuroscience2568–573
13.
GauthierIWilliamsPTarrM JTanakaJ, 1998“Training ‘greeble’ experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes”Vision Research382401–2428
14.
HalberstadtJGladstoneR LLevineG M, 2003“Featural processing in face preferences”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology39270–278
15.
KilgourA Rde GelderBLedermanS J, 2004“Haptic face recognition and prospagnosia”Neuropsychologia42707–712
16.
KilgourA RKitadaRServosPJamesTLedermanS J, 2005“Haptic face identification activates ventral occipital and temporal areas: An fMRI study”Brain & Cognition59246–257
17.
KilgourA RLedermanS J, 2002“Face recognition by hand”Perception & Psychophysics64339–352
18.
KlatzkyR LLedermanS J, in press “Object recognition by touch”, in Blindness, Brain Plasticity and Spatial Function Eds RieserJAshmeadDEbnerFCornA, (New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
19.
KlatzkyR LLedermanS JBalakrishnanJ, 1991“Task-driven extraction of object contour by human haptics: I”Robotica943–51
20.
KlatzkyR LLoomisJ MLedermanS JWakeHFujitaN, 1993“Haptic identification of objects and their depictions”Perception & Psychophysics54170–178
21.
LakatosSMarksL, 1999“Haptic form perception: Relative salience of local and global features”Perception & Psychophysics61895–908
22.
LederHBruceV, 1998“Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A51449–473
23.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR L, 1987“Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition”Cognitive Psychology19342–368
24.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR L, 1990“Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration”Cognitive Psychology22421–459
25.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR L, 2004“Multisensory texture perception”, in Handbook of Multisensory Processes Eds CalvertGSpenceCSteinB, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 107–122
26.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR LBalakrishnanJ, 1991“Task-driven extraction of object contour by human haptics: II”Robotica9179–188
27.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR LChatawayCSummersC, 1990“Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two dimensional pictures of common objects”Perception & Psychophysics4754–64
28.
MarksD, 1973“Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures”British Journal of Psychology6417–24
29.
MaurerDLe GrandRMondlochC J, 2002“The many faces of configural processing”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6255–260
30.
MoscovitchMMoscovitchD A, 2000“Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces”, in The Cognitive Neuroscience of Face Processing A Special Issue of the Journal of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Eds KanwisherNMoscovitchM, (Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press) pp 201–220
31.
PietriniPFureyM LRicciardiEGobbiniM IWuW HCohenLGuazzelliMHaxbyJ V, 2004“Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA1015658–5663
32.
RhodesG, 1988“Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinates of facial appearance”Perception1743–63
33.
RoschMMervisCGrayWJohnsonDBoyes-BraemP, 1976“Basic objects in natural categories”Cognitive Psychology8382–439
34.
RossionBGauthierIGoffauxVTarrM JCrommelinckM, 2002“Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses”Psychological Science13250–257
35.
SearcyJ HBartlettJ C, 1996“Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information of faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22904–915
36.
SergentJ, 1984“An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception”British Journal of Psychology75221–242
37.
TanakaJ WCurranT, 2001“A neural basis for expert object recognition”Psychological Science1243–47
38.
TanakaJ WFarahM J, 1993“Parts and wholes in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A46225–245
39.
ValentineT, 1988“Upside-down faces: A review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition”British Journal of Psychology79471–491
40.
YinR K, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145
