In the present study, participants searched for a conjunction of color and orientation either from the same part of an object (same-part display), or from different parts of an object (different-part display). While no difference was found between the two display conditions in single feature searches, conjunction search in the same-part display was significantly faster than that in the different-part display. This same-part advantage applies to both the inner part as well as the outer part of an object. These results suggest that features are more readily integrated if they are from the same part of an object than if they are from different parts of an object. The formation of object part representations thus influences how features are integrated and encoded during visual information processing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportD A, 1971“Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions”Perception & Psychophysics10104–108
2.
BaylisG CDriverJ, 1993“Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19451–470
3.
BaylisG CDriverJ, 1994“Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition in single visual objects”Visual Cognition1377–400
4.
BaylisG CDriverJ, 1995“Obligatory edge assignment in vision–The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance211323–1342
5.
BehrmannMTipperS P, 1994“Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect”, in Attention and Performance XV Eds UmiltaCMoscovitchM (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 351–375
6.
DuncanJ, 1984“Selective attention and the organization of visual information”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113501–517
7.
EglyRDriverJRafalR D, 1994“Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General123161–177
8.
GoldsmithM, 1998“What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General127189–219
9.
HoffmanD DRichardsW A, 1984“Parts of recognition”Cognition1865–96
10.
HoffmanD DSinghM, 1997“Salience of visual parts”Cognition6329–78
11.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, 1993“Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology”, in Attention and Performance XIV Eds MeyerD EKornblumS (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 143–162
12.
IrwinD EAndrewsR V, 1996“Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements”, in Attention and Performance XVI Eds InuiTMcClellandJ L (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 125–155
13.
LuckS JVogelE K, 1997“The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions”Nature390279–281
14.
MattingleyJ BDavisGDriverJ, 1997“Preattentive filling-in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction”Science275671–674
15.
MooreC MYantisSVaughanB, 1998“Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion”Psychological Science9104–110
16.
PalmerS E, 1999Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
17.
PhillipsW A, 1974“On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory”Perception & Psychophysics16283–290
18.
PhillipsW AChristieD F M, 1977“Components of visual memory”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology29117–133
19.
PrinzmetalW, 1981“Principles of feature integration in visual perception”Perception & Psycho-physics4330–340
20.
PrinzmetalWMillis-WrightM, 1984“Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration”Cognitive Psychology16305–340
21.
RockI, 1983The Logic of Perception (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
22.
SinghMSeyraninanG DHoffmanD D, 1999“Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule”Perception & Psychophysics61636–660
23.
TreismanAGeladeG, 1980“A feature-integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297–136
24.
VogelE KWoodmanG FEadsA CLuckS J, 1998“Masking in visual working memory: Evidence for a limited-capacity encoding mechanism”, poster presented at the 1998 Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA (available from the authors)
WolfeJ MCaveK RFranzelS L, 1989“Guided search–An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15419–433
27.
WolfeJ MYuK PStewartM IShorterA DFriedman-HillS RCaveK R, 1990“Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16879–892
28.
XuY, in press, “Integrating color and shape in visual short-term memory for objects with parts”Perception & Psychophysics
29.
XuYSinghM, in press, “Early computation of part structure: evidence from visual search”Perception & Psychophysics
