We have developed a detection task in which subjects identify a pair of collinear edges in a field of polygons. Five of our six subjects showed significant, rapid learning at this task. Four showed evidence of retention a day and a week later. In several transfer tests, we found that disruption of the distractors produced a significant drop-off in performance. These results are consistent with a model in which collinear targets initially produce a salience signal too weak to be reliably detected over the noise of the distractors. As the experiment proceeds, the visual system learns to dampen the distractor signals, allowing for more reliable detection.
AhissarMHochsteinS, 1996b“Learning pop-out detection: specificities to stimulus characteristics”Vision Research363487–3500
3.
BallKSekulerR, 1982“A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination”Science218697–698
4.
ChunMJianY, 1998“Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention”Cognitive Psychology3628–71
5.
FiorentiniABerardiN, 1980“Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency”Nature28743–44
6.
JeoRYonebayashiYAllmanJ, 1995“Perceptual memory of cognitively defined contours: A rapid, robust, and long-lasting form of memory”, in Maturational Windows and Adult Cortical Plasticity Eds JuleszBKovacsI (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley) pp 137–148
7.
KarniASagiD, 1991“Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA884966–4970
8.
RamachandranV SBraddickO, 1973“Orientation-specific learning in stereopsis”Perception2371–376
9.
RubinNNakayamaKShapleyR, 1997“Abrupt learning and retinal size specificity in illusory-contour perception”Current Biology7461–467
10.
TanakaYSagiD, 2000“Fast plasticity of long-range interactions induced by temporal cueing”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science41(4) S256
