Gray disks inserted into the central gaps of an Ehrenstein pattern appear to lighten up and scintillate with each movement of the eye or stimulus pattern. We call this phenomenon scintillating lustre. Both phenomena—illusory brightness and scintillating lustre—depend on the presence of the radial inducing lines converging onto the gaps. Without the radii the gray disks appear matte. Using parametric stimulus variation, we show that the strength of scintillating lustre covaries with line-induced brightness enhancement when the length, width, number, and contrast of the radial lines, as well as the size of the gaps in the Ehrenstein figure, are varied. Following the proposal by Anstis (2000, Vision Research40 2551–2556), we suggest that lustre results from a competition between the ON and OFF visual pathways. Whereas Helmholtz's binocular gloss is elicited by stereoscopically fused incremental and decremental stimuli, the present study demonstrates that lustre can also arise from the interaction between line-induced brightness (illusory increment) and a dark gray disk (physical decrement).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenR AEssickG KSiegelR M, 1985“Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons”Science230456–458
2.
AndersenR ASnyderL HLiC SStricanneB, 1993“Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information”Current Opinion in Neurobiology3171–176
3.
AnstisS, 2000“Monocular lustre from flicker”Vision Research402551–2556
4.
BressanPMingollaESpillmannLWatanabeT, 1997“Neon color spreading: a review”Perception261353–1363
5.
BrignerW LGallagherM B, 1974“Subjective contour: Apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast”Perceptual & Motor Skills381047–1053
6.
EhrensteinW, 1941“Uber Abwandlungen der L. Hermannschen Helligkeitserscheinung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie15083–91 [translated by HoggA“Modifications of the brightness phenomenon of L. Hermann”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (1987, New York: Springer) pp 35–39]
7.
EhrensteinW, 1954Probleme der ganzheitspsychologischen Wahrnehmungslehre (Leipzig: J A Barth)
FuldKO'DonnellK, 1984“Brightness matching and scaling of the Ehrenstein illusion”, in Sensory Experience, Adaptation, and Perception Eds SpillmannLWootenB R (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 461–469
10.
GoveAGrossbergSMingollaE, 1995“Brightness perception, illusory contours, and cortico-geniculate feedback”Visual Neuroscience121027–1052
von HelmholtzH, 1909–1911/1962Handbuch der physiologischen Optik volumes 1–3, 3rd edition, Eds GullstrandAvon KriesJNagelW (Hamburg: Voss) [translated by SouthallJ P CHelmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics (1924–1925, Rochester, NY: Optical Society of America; republished 1962, New York: Dover) first edition published 1867, Leipzig: Voss]
13.
HeringE, 1920/1964Zur Lehre vom Lichtsinn (1920, Berlin: Springer) [translated by HurvichL MJamesonDOutlines of a Theory of the Light Sense (1964, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)]
14.
von der HeydtRPeterhansEBaumgartnerG, 1984“Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses”Science2241260–1262
15.
JoryMDayR H, 1979“The relationship between brightness contrast and illusory contours”Perception83–9
16.
JungR, 1961“Neuronal integration in the visual cortex and its significance for visual information”, in Sensory Communication Ed. RosenblithW A (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 627–674
17.
JungR, 1973“Visual perception and neurophysiology”, in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, volume VII/3A, Ed. JungR (Berlin: Springer) pp 1–152
18.
KaiharaTTakahashiSTakemotoA, 1994“A linkage of chromatic and achromatic cues in neon color effect”Japanese Psychological Research36138–148
19.
LewaldJEhrensteinW H, 2000“Visual and proprioceptive shifts in perceived egocentric direction induced by eye-position”Vision Research40539–547
20.
LingelbachBHeidlerALingelbachEEhrensteinW H, 2000“Biological filtering and human contrast vision”Pflügers Archiv439, supplementR390
21.
PetrySHarbeckAConwayJLeveyJ, 1983“Stimulus determinants of brightness and distinctness of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics34169–174
22.
PinnaB, 1987“Induzione di chiarezza e spot di Hermann”, in II Laboratorio e la Città. XXI Congresso degli Psicologi Italiani Eds MajerVMaeranMSantinelloM (Milan: Guerini) page 159
PinnaBBrelstaffG, 2000“A new illusion of relative motion”Vision Research402091–2096
25.
RediesC, 1989“Discontinuities along lines: Psychophysics and neurophysiology”Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews1317–22
26.
RediesCCrookJCreutzfeldtO, 1986“Neuronal responses to borders with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus”Experimental Brain Research61469–481
27.
RediesCSpillmannLKunzK, 1984“Colored neon flanks and line gap enhancement”Vision Research241301–1309
28.
Salvano-PardieuV, 2000“Spatial factors of brightness illusion in the Ehrenstein figure”Perception29709–720
29.
SchillerP H, 1992“The ON and OFF channels of the visual system”Trends in Neurosciences11586–92
SchraufMWistE REhrensteinW H, 2000“The scintillating grid illusion during smooth pursuit, stimulus motion, and brief exposure in humans”Neuroscience Letters284126–128
32.
SpillmannL, 1975“Perceptual modification of the Ehrenstein illusion”, in Gestalttheorie in der modernen Psychologie Eds ErtelSKemmlerLStadlerM (Darmstadt: D Steinkopff) pp 210–218
33.
SpillmannLDrespB, 1995“Phenomena of illusory form: Can we bridge the gap between levels of explanation?”Perception241333–1364
34.
SpillmannLFuldKGerritsH J M, 1976“Brightness contrast in the Ehrenstein illusion”Vision Research16713–719
35.
SpillmannLFuldKNeumeyerC, 1984“Brightness matching, brightness cancellation, and increment threshold in the Ehrenstein illusion”Perception13513–520
36.
SpillmannLTulunay-KeeseyÜOlsonJ, 1993“Apparent floating in normal and stabilized vision”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science34(4) 1031
