Stimuli composed of two overlapped faces, one rotated 45° clockwise and the other 45° counterclockwise, produce perceptual rivalry whereby both faces cannot be simultaneously perceived. We obtained subjective and quantitative measures of this rivalry effect and examined if it persists with inverted stimuli. Our results show that upright stimuli are multistable, with alternations occurring from one face to the other within 2 s. Inverted stimuli were instead perceived as ambiguous in half of the trials, indicating weaker perceptual rivalry in that condition. We suggest that overlapped faces produce perceptual rivalry because each face is readily interpreted into a Gestalt, an effect that in turn is dependent upon orientation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttneaveF, 1971“Multistability in perception”Scientific American225(6) 63–71.
2.
BoutetIGentes-HawnAChaudhuriA, 2000“Holistic encoding of composite faces interferes with featural encoding irrespective of attention”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science41S42.
3.
CareySDiamondR, 1994“Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?”Visual Cognition1253–274.
4.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117.
5.
EngelE, 1956“The role of content in binocular resolution”American Journal of Psychology6987–91.
6.
FarahM JWilsonK DDrainH MTanakaJ W, 1995“The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory face-specific perceptual mechanisms”Vision Research352089–2093.
7.
GaltonF, 1883Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development (London: MacMillan).
8.
Garcia-PerezM A, 1992“Eye movements and perceptual multistability”, in The Role of Eye Movements in Perceptual Processes Ed. ChekalukELlewellynK (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science) pp 73–109.
9.
GauthierITarrM J, 1997“Becoming a greeble expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition”Vision Research371673–1682.
10.
GauthierIWilliamsPTarrM JTanakaJ, 1998“Training ‘greeble’ experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes”Vision Research382401–2428.
11.
GregoryR L, 1970The Intelligent Eye (New York: McGraw-Hill).
12.
KempRMcManusCPigottT, 1990“Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images”Perception19531–543.
13.
LongG MOlszweskiA D, 1999“To reverse or not to reverse: When is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?”American Journal of Psychology11241–71.
14.
LongG MToppinoT C, 1981“Multiple representations of the same reversible figure: Implications for cognitive decisional interpretations”Perception & Psychophysics10231–234.
15.
LumerE DFirstonK JReesG, 1998“Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain”Science2801930–1934.
16.
PeltonL HSolleyC MBrentS B, 1969“Stability and attraction of perceptual organizations in the reversible figure – ground phenomenon”Perceptual & Motor Skills28983–991.
17.
ReinitzM TMorrisseyJDembJ, 1994“Role of attention in face encoding”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition20161–168.
18.
RhodesGBrakeSAtkinsonA, 1993“What's lost in inverted faces?”Cognition4725–27.
19.
RockI, 1975An Introduction to Perception (New York: MacMillan).
20.
RockIMitchenerK, 1992“Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects”Perception & Psychophysics2139–45.
21.
RuggieriBFernandezM F, 1994“Gaze orientation in perception of reversible figures”Perceptual & Motor Skills78299–303.
22.
ScottoM AOlivaG ATuccioM T, 1990“Eye movements and reversal rates of ambiguous patterns”Perceptual & Motor Skills701059–1073.
23.
SergentJ, 1984“An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception”British Journal of Psychology75221–242.
24.
SheinbergD LLogothetisN K, 1997“The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA943408–3413.
25.
TanakaJGauthierI, 1997“Expertise in object and face recognition”The Psychology of Learning and Motivation3683–125.
26.
TanakaJ WSengcoJ A, 1997“Features and their configuration in face recognition”Memory & Cognition25583–592.
27.
TongFNakayamaKVaughanJ TKanwisherN, 1998“Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex”Neuron21753–759.
28.
ToppinoT CLongG M, 1987“Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don't change that channel”Perception & Psychophysics4237–48.
29.
TsalYKolbetL, 1985“Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention”The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A3725–37.
30.
YinR K, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145.
31.
YoungA WHellawellDHayD C, 1987“Configural information in face perception”Perception16747–759.
32.
YuKBlakeR, 1992“Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181158–1173.
