We tested the ability of children 3–5 years of age to recognise biological motion displays. Children and adults were presented with moving point-light configurations depicting a walking person, four-legged animals (dogs), and a bird. Participants were able to reliably recognise displays with biological motion, but failed in the identification of a static (four consecutive frames taken from each sequence) version. The results indicate that, irrespective of the highly reduced and unusual structural information available in point-light displays, biological motion is sufficient for reliable recognition of human and non-human forms at an age as early as 3 years. Moreover, 5-year-olds exhibit the ceiling level of recognition. The findings are discussed in the context of the neuropsychological and brain mechanisms involved in biological motion perception.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlströmVBlakeRAhlströmU, 1997“Perception of biological motion”Perception261539–1548.
2.
BarclayCCuttingJKozlowskiL, 1978“Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition”Perception & Psychophysics23145–152.
3.
BellefeuilleAFaubertJ, 1998“Independence of contour and biological-motion cues for motion-defined animal shapes”Perception27225–235.
4.
BertenthalB IPintoJ, 1994“Global processing of biological motions”Psychological Science5221–225.
5.
BertenthalB IProffittD RCuttingJ E, 1984“Infants' sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology37213–230.
6.
BertenthalB IProffittDKramerS, 1987“Perception of biomechanical motions by infants: Implementation of various processing constraints”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4577–585.
7.
BertenthalB IProffittD RSpetnerN BThomasA, 1985“Development of the perception of biomechanical motions”Child Development56531–543.
BondaEPetridesMOstryDEvansA, 1996“Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion”Journal of Neuroscience163737–3744.
10.
BrownlowSDixonA REgbertC ARadcliffeR D, 1997“Perception of movement and dancer characteristics from point-light displays of dance”Psychological Record47411–421.
CoweyAVainaL M, 2000“Blindness to form from motion despite intact static form perception and motion detection”Neuropsychologia38566–578.
13.
CrawleyR AGoodJMMStillA WValentiS S, 2000“Perception of sex from complex body movement in young children”Ecological Psychology12231–240.
14.
CuttingJ EMooreCMorrisonR, 1988“Masking the motions of human gait”Perception & Psychophysics44339–347.
15.
DittrichW HLeaSEGBarrettJGurrP R, 1998“Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: Visual concept discrimination and biological motion”Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior70281–299.
16.
DittrichW HTrosciankoTLeaSEGMorganD, 1996“Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance”Perception25727–738.
17.
FoxRMcDanielC, 1982“The perception of biological motion by human infants”Science218486–487.
18.
GrossmanEDonnellyMPriceRMorganVPickensDNeighborGBlakeR, 2000“Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience12711–720.
19.
JohanssonG, 1973“Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis”Perception & Psychophysics14201–211.
20.
KaiserMProffittD, 1984“The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information”Child Development551614–1624.
21.
KozlowskiL TCuttingJ E, 1977“Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display”Perception & Psychophysics21575–580.
22.
Krägeloh-MannIToftPLundingJAndersenJPrydsOLouH C, 1999“Brain lesions in preterms—origin, consequences and compensation”Acta Paediatrica88897–908.
23.
LassondeMFaubertMSchiavettoABilodeauL, 1993“Relative contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual systems to motion-defined form”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science34(4) 795.
24.
MatherGMurdochL, 1994“Gender recognition in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B258149–155.
25.
MatherGRadfordKWestS, 1992“Low-level processing of biological motion”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B249149–155.
26.
MatherGWestS, 1993“Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays”Perception22759–766.
27.
MitkinA APavlovaM A, 1990“Changing a natural orientation: Recognition of biological motion pattern by children and adults”Psychologische Beiträge3228–35.
OmoriEWatanabeS, 1996“Discrimination of Johansson's stimuli in pigeons”International Journal of Comparative Psychology992.
30.
PavlovaM A, 1985“On some developmental trends in perception and recognition of static and moving configurations”, in Vision of Organisms and Robots Ed. KetlerisJ J (Vilnius, Lithuania: University Press) pp 193–194.
31.
PavlovaM A, 1989“The role of inversion in perception of biological motion pattern”Perception18510.
32.
PavlovaMKrägeloh-MannISokolovABirbaumerN, 2000a“Simultaneous masking of a point-light walker in children”, in Fechner Day 2000 Ed. BonnetC (Strasbourg: The ISP) pp 278–284.
33.
PavlovaMLutzenbergerWSokolovABirbaumerN, 1999“Biological motion perception and gamma MEG activity”, in Looking Back: The End of 20th Century Psychophysics Eds KilleenPUttalW (Tempe, AZ: The ISP) pp 320–325.
34.
PavlovaMLutzenbergerWSokolovABirbaumerN, 2000b“Task-driven gamma MEG response to a point-light walker”Society for Neuroscience Abstracts26(part 2) 2223.
35.
PavlovaMSokolovA, 2000“Orientation specificity in biological motion perception”Perception & Psychophysics62889–899.
36.
PellecchiaG LGarrettG E, 1997“Assessing lumbar stabilization from point-light and normal video displays of manual lifting”Perceptual & Motor Skills85931–937.
37.
PerrettD IHarriesM HBensonP JChittyA JMistlinA J, 1989“Retrieval of structure from rigid and biological motion: An analysis of the visual responses of neurons in the macaque temporal cortex”, in AI and the Eye Eds BlakeATrosciankoT (Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley) pp 181–200.
38.
PintoJShiffrarM, 1999“Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays”Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam)102293–318.
39.
PoiznerHBellugiULutes-DriscolV, 1981“Perception of American Sign Language in dynamic point-light displays”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance6430–440.
40.
RegolinLTommasiLVallortigaraG, 2000“Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure”Animal Cognition353–60.
41.
RunesonSFrykholmG, 1983“Kinematic specification of dynamics as information basis for the perception and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General112585–615.
42.
ThorntonI MPintoJShiffrarM, 1998“The visual perception of human locomotion”Cognitive Neuropsychology15535–552.
43.
WalkR DHomanC P, 1984“Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society22437–440.
44.
YamaguchiM KFujitaK, 1999“Perception of biological motion by newly hatched chicks and quail”Perception28Supplement, 23–24.
