It is known that rotation of a furnished room around the roll axis of erect subjects produces an illusion of 360° self-rotation in many subjects. Exposure of erect subjects to stationary tilted visual frames or rooms produces only up to 20° of illusory tilt. But, in studies using static tilted rooms, subjects remained erect and the body axis was not aligned with the room. We have revealed a new class of disorientation illusions that occur in many subjects when placed in a 90° or 180° tilted room containing polarised objects (familiar objects with tops and bottoms). For example, supine subjects looking up at a wall of the room feel upright in an upright room and their arms feel weightless when held out from the body. We call this the levitation illusion. We measured the incidence of 90° or 180° reorientation illusions in erect, supine, recumbent, and inverted subjects in a room tilted 90° or 180°. We report that reorientation illusions depend on the displacement of the visual scene rather than of the body. However, illusions are most likely to occur when the visual and body axes are congruent. When the axes are congruent, illusions are least likely to occur when subjects are prone rather than supine, recumbent, or inverted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonRHowardIPZacherJ, 1999“Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room”Perception28299–306
2.
AschSEWitkinHA, 1948a“Studies in space orientation: I. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields”Journal of Experimental Psychology38325–337
3.
AschSEWitkinHA, 1948b“Studies in space orientation: II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted”Journal of Experimental Psychology38455–477
4.
CheungBSKHowardIPNedzelskiJMLandoltJP, 1989“Circular vection about horizontal axes in bilateral labyrinthine-defective subjects”Acta Otolaryngologica108336–344
5.
CoatsACNorfleetWT, 1998“Immersed false vertical room. A new motion sickness model”Journal of Vestibular Research8135–149
6.
CorreiaMJHixsonWCNivenJI, 1968“On predictive equations for subjective judgments of vertical and horizon in a force field”Acta Otolaryngologica230Supplement, 3–20
7.
DichgansJDienerHCBrandtT, 1974“Optokinetic — graviceptive interaction in different head positions”Acta Otolaryngologica78391–398
8.
EbenholtzSM, 1977“Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size”Perception & Psychophysics22531–538
9.
EbenholtzSMBenzschawelTL, 1977“The rod and frame effect and induced head tilt as a function of observation distance”Perception & Psychophysics22491–496
10.
FriedericiADLeveltWJM, 1987“Resolving perceptual conflicts: the cognitive mechanism of spatial orientation”Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine58164–169
11.
de GraafBBekkeringAErasmusCBlesW, 1992“Influence of visual, vestibular, and cervical tilt information on ocular rotation and perception of the horizontal”Journal of Vestibular Research215–30
12.
GraybielAClarkB, 1962“Perception of the horizontal or vertical with head upright, on the side, and inverted under static conditions and during exposure to centripetal force”Aerospace Medicine33147–155
13.
GuerrazMPoquinDOhlmannT, 1998“The role of head-centric spatial reference with a static and kinetic visual disturbance”Perception & Psychophysics60287–295
14.
HeldRDichgansJBauerJ, 1975“Characteristics of moving visual areas influencing spatial orientation”Science141722–723
15.
HowardIP, 1982Human Visual Orientation (Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley)
16.
HowardIPCheungBSKLandoltJ, 1988“Influence of vection axis and body posture on visually-induced self rotation”Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development43315-1–15-8
17.
HowardIPChildersonL, 1994“The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt”Perception23753–762
HowardIPJenkinHHuG, 2000“Visually induced disorientation as a function of age”Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine7187–91
20.
HowardIPTempletonWB, 1966Human Spatial Orientation (Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley)
21.
KleintH, 1936“Versuche über die Wahrnehmung”Zeitschrift fur Psychologie1381–34
22.
KleintH, 1937“Versuche über die Wahrnehmung. II. Über Bewegung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie1419–44
23.
KohlerI, 1953“Umgewöhnung im Wahrnehmungsbereich”Pyramide592–95, 6109–113
24.
MittelstaedtH, 1983“A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical”Naturwissenschaften70272–281
25.
MittelstaedtH, 1986“The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extra-retinal cues”Acta Psychologica6363–88
26.
MorantRBBellerHK, 1965“Adaptation to prismatically rotated visual fields”Science148530–531
27.
NemireKCohenMM, 1993“Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane”Perception & Psychophysics53106–116
28.
PasseyGE, 1950“The perception of the vertical: IV. Adjustment to the vertical with normal and tilted visual frames”Journal of Experimental Psychology40738–745
29.
RopperAH, 1983“Illusion of tilting of the visual environment”Journal of Clinical Neuroophthalmology3147–151
30.
SchöneH, 1964“On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation”Aerospace Medicine35764–772
31.
SchöneH, 1984Spatial Orientation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press) pp 122–124
32.
SchöneHUdo de HaesH, 1968“Perception of gravity-vertical as a function of head and trunk position”Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie60440–444
33.
SigmanEGoodenoughDRFlannaganM, 1978“Subjective estimates of body tilt and the rod-and-frame test”Perceptual & Motor Skills471051–1056
34.
SingerGPurcellATAustinM, 1970“The effect of structure and degree of tilt on the tilted room illusion”Perception & Psychophysics7250–252
35.
SolmsMKaplan-SolmsKSalingMMillerP, 1988“Inverted vision after frontal lobe disease”Cortex24499–509
36.
SteinerIShahinRMelamedE, 1987“Acute upside down reversal of vision in transient vertebro-basilar ischemia”Neurology371685–1686
37.
StrattonGM, 1897“Vision without inversion of the retinal image”Psychological Review4341–360, 463–481
38.
TempletonWB, 1973“The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation”Perception & Psychophysics14451–457
39.
TiliketCVentre-DomineyJVighettoAGrochowickiM, 1996“Room tilt illusion”Archives of Neurology531259–1264
40.
WertheimerM, 1912“Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane61161–265
41.
WitkinHA, 1949“Perception of body position and the position of the visual field”Psychological Monographs6(7) 1–63 (whole issue)
42.
WitkinHAAschSE, 1948a“Studies in space orientation: II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted”Journal of Experimental Psychology38455–477
43.
WitkinHAAschSE, 1948b“Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field”Journal of Experimental Psychology38603–614
44.
WitkinHAAschSE, 1948c“Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields”Journal of Experimental Psychology38762–782
YoungLROmanCMDichgansJM, 1975“Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation”Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine46264–269
