When viewing a wide-angle visual display, which rotates in the frontoparallel plane around the line of sight, observers experience an illusory shift of the direction of gravity; this shift leads to an apparent tilt of the body and displaces allocentric space coordinates. In this study, subjects adjusted an indicator to the apparent horizontal while viewing a rotating display. To determine whether top–down processes could affect the illusion, the subjects were asked to visualize a rotating configuration of dots onto a blank central portion of the moving visual field. Visualizing dots and actually viewing the dots deflected the spatial judgment in very similar ways. These results demonstrate that top–down processing can affect allocentric space coordinates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonR SHowardI PZacherJ E, 1999“Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room”Perception28299–306.
2.
AndersenG JBraunsteinM L, 1985“Induced self-motion in central vision”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1915–31.
3.
BerthozAPavardBYoungL R, 1975“Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linear vection) basic characteristics and visual–vestibular interactions”Experimental Brain Research23471–489.
4.
BerthozAViaud-DelmonI, 1999“Multisensory integration in spatial orientation”Current Opinion in Neurobiology9708–712.
5.
BettsG ACurthoysI S, 1998“Visually perceived vertical and visually perceived horizontal are not orthogonal”Vision Research381989–1999.
6.
BottiniGSterziRPaulesuEVallarGCappaS FErminioFPassinghamR EFrithC DFrackowiakR S, 1994“Identification of the central vestibular projections in man: A Positron emission tomography activation study”Experimental Brain Research99164–169.
BrandtTDichgansJKoenigE, 1973“Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception”Experimental Brain Research16476–491.
9.
CooperL, 1976“Demonstration of a mental analogy of an external rotation”Perception & Psychophysics19296–302.
10.
CorballisM CMcLarenR, 1982“Interaction between perceived and imagined rotation”Perception & Psychophysics720–43.
DichgansJHeldRYoungLBrandtT, 1972“Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity”Science1871217–1219.
13.
FischerM HKornmüllerA E, 1930“Optokinetisch ausgelöste Bewegungswahrnehmungen und optokinetischer Nystagmus”Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie (Leipzig)41273–308.
14.
GildenDBlakeRHurstG, 1995“Neural adaptation of imaginary visual motion”Cognitive Psychology281–16.
15.
GuerrazMPoquinDOhlmannT, 1998“The role of head-centric spatial reference with a static and kinetic visual disturbance”Perception & Psychophysics60287–295.
16.
GrüsserO JPauseMSchreiterU, 1990“Localization and responses of neurones in the parieto-insular vestibular cortex of awake monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)”Journal of Physiology430537–557.
17.
HeilMBajricJRoeslerFHennighausenE, 1997“A rotation aftereffect changes both the speed and the preferred direction of mental rotation”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23681–692.
18.
HeldRDichgansJBauerJ, 1975“Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation”Vision Research15357–365.
19.
HennVYoungL RFinleyC, 1974“Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields”Brain Research71144–149.
20.
HowardI PHeckmannT, 1989“Circular vection as a function of relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays”Perception18657–665.
21.
HowardI PHowardA, 1994“Vection: The contributions of absolute and relative visual motion”Perception23745–751.
22.
KennedyR SHettingerL JHarmD LOrdyJ MDunlapW P, 1996“Psychophysical scaling of circular vection (CV) produced by optokinetic (OKN) motion: Individual differences and effects of practice”Journal of Vestibular Research6331–341.
23.
KosslynS MBrunnJ LCaveK RWallachR W, 1984“Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis”Cognition18195–243.
24.
KosslynS MDiGirolamoGThompsonW LAlpertN M, 1998“Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography”Psychophysiology35151–161.
25.
KosslynS MPascual-LeoneAFelicianOCamposanoSKeenanJ PThompsonW LGanisGSukelK EAlpertN M, 1999“The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS”Science284167–170.
26.
KosslynS MThompsonW LKimI JAlpertN M, 1995“Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex”Nature378496–498.
27.
LacknerJ RLevineM S, 1979“Changes in apparent body orientation and sensory localization induced by vibration of postural muscles: Vibratory myesthetic illusions”Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine50346–354.
28.
LepecqJ-CGiannopuluIBaudonniereP-M, 1995“Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children”Perception24435–449.
29.
LestienneFSoechtingJBerthozA, 1977“Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes”Experimental Brain Research28363–384.
30.
LobelEKleineJ FBihanD LLeroy-WilligABerthozA, 1998“Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation”Journal of Neurophysiology802699–2709.
31.
MachE, 1875Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen (Leipzig: Engelmann).
32.
MastFJarchowT, 1996“Perceived body position and the visual horizontal”Brain Research Bulletin40393–398.
33.
MastFKosslynS MBerthozA, 1999“Visual mental imagery interferes with allocentric orientation judgements”NeuroReport103549–3553.
34.
MerfeldD MZupanLPeterkaR J, 1999“Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration”Nature398615–618.
35.
MergnerTSchweigartGMullerMHlavackaFBeckerW, 2000“Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation”Archives Italiennes de Biologie138139–166.
36.
MittelstaedtH, 1991“The role of the otoliths in perception of the orientation of self and the world to the vertical”Zoologisches Jahrbuch der Physiologie95419–425.
37.
MotterB C, 1993“Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli”Journal of Neurophysiology70909–919.
38.
MurakamiIShimojoS, 1996“Assimilation-type and contrast-type bias of motion induced by the surround in a random-dot display: Evidence for center-surround antagonism”Vision Research363629–3639.
39.
NakamuraSShimojoS, 1999“Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection)”Perception28893–902.
40.
O'CravenK MRosenB RKwongK KTreismanASavoyR L, 1997“Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT–MST”Neuron18591–598.
41.
ParsonsL MFoxP TDownsJ HGlassTHirschT BMartinC CJerabekP ALancasterJ L, 1995“Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET”Nature37554–58.
42.
PavardBBerthozA, 1977“Linear acceleration modifies the perceived velocity of a moving visual scene”Perception6529–540.
43.
ShepardR NCooperL A, 1982Mental Images and Their Transformations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
44.
Van BeuzekomA DVan GisbergenJAM, 2000“Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates”Journal of Neurophysiology8411–27.
45.
YardleyL, 1990“Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field”Perception & Psychophysics48131–134.
46.
YoungL RDichgansJMurphyRBrandtT, 1973“Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception”Acta Oto-Laryngologica7624–31.
47.
YoungL ROmanC MWattD GMoneyK ELichtenbergB KKenyonR VArrottA P, 1986a“MIT/Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 1. Sensory adaptation to weightlessness and readaptation to one-g: An overview”Experimental Brain Research64291–298.
48.
YoungL RShelhamerMModestinoS, 1986b“MIT/Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 2. Visual vestibular tilt interaction in weightlessness”Experimental Brain Research64299–307.
