Cueing paradigms have become popular in assessing the processes of attention. In two experiments we manipulated (i) the contrast of the target, and (ii) the similarity between the targets discriminated. We used a cue that would isolate the exogenous component of attention. Both a reduction in target contrast and an increase in target similarity raised overall reaction times by a similar amount; however, the target contrast manipulation produced a much greater cueing effect compared with the target similarity manipulation. The results suggest that manipulation of target contrast changes the attention cueing effect at a stage of attracting attention to a location of the target (the ‘move’ stage), rather than at a later processing stage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennettKMBWatermanCScarpaMCastielloU, 1995“Covert visuospatial attentional mechanisms in Parkinson's disease”Brain118153–166.
2.
BonnelA-MSteinJ-FBertucciP, 1992“Does attention modulate the perception of luminance changes?”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A44601–626.
3.
BrawnP TSnowdenR J, 2000“Attention to overlapping objects: Detection vs discrimination of luminance changes”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26342–358.
4.
BundesenC, 1990“A theory of visual attention”Psychological Review97523–547.
5.
CorbettaMMiezinF MShulmanG LPetersenS E, 1993“A PET study of visuospatial attention”Journal of Neuroscience131202–1256.
6.
DowningC J, 1988“Expectancy and visual spatial-attention: Effects on perceptual quality”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14188–202.
7.
EnnsJ TBrodeurD A, 1989“A developmental study of covert orienting to peripheral visual cues”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology48171–189.
8.
FolkC LRemingtonR WJohnstonJ C, 1992“Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181030–1044.
9.
GibsonB SKelseyE M, 1998“Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24699–706.
10.
HawkinsH LShaftoM GRichardsonK, 1988“Effects of target luminance and cue validity in the latency of visual detection”Perception & Psychophysics44484–492.
11.
HughesH C, 1984“Effects of flash luminance and positional expectancies on visual response latency”Perception & Psychophysics36177–184.
12.
JohannesSMünteT FHeinzeH JMangunG R, 1995“Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing”Cognitive Brain Research2189–205.
13.
LaBergeDBrownV, 1989“Theory of attentional operations in shape identification”Psychological Review96101–124.
14.
MaruffPPantelisC, 1999“Attention and neuropsychiatric disorders”Current Opinion in Psychiatry12339–344.
15.
MüllerH JRabbitPMA, 1989“Reflexive orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15315–330.
16.
NissenM JCorkinS, 1985“Effectiveness of attentional cueing in older and younger adults”Journal of Gerontology40185–191.
17.
ParasuramanRGreenwoodP MHaxbyJ VGradyC L, 1992“Visuospatial attention in dementia of the Alzheimer type”Brain115711–733.
18.
PosnerMPetersenS E, 1990“The attention system of the human brain”Annual Review of Neuroscience1325–42.
19.
PosnerM IRaichleM E, 1997Images of MindScientific American Library.
20.
PosnerM ISnyderCRRDavidsonB J, 1980“Attention and the detection of signals”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General109160–174.
21.
PosnerM IWalkerJ AFriedrichF JRafalR D, 1984“Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention”Journal of Neuroscience41863–1874.
22.
RafalR DRobertsonL C, 1995“The neurology of visual attention”, in The Cognitive Neurosciences Ed. GazzanigaM (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 625–648.
23.
RiggioLKirsnerK, 1997“The relationship between central and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation”Perception & Psychophysics59885–899.
24.
SagiDJuleszB, 1985“ ‘Where’ and ‘what’ in vision”Science2281217–1219.
25.
SclarGMaunsellJHRLennieP, 1990“Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey”Vision Research301–10.
26.
ShapleyR, 1986“The importance of contrast for the activity of single neurons, the VEP and perception”Vision Research2645–61.
27.
TheeuwesJ, 1994“Exogenous and endogenous control of visual selection”Perception23429–440.
28.
TellinghuisenD JZimbaL DRobinD A, 1996“Endogenous visuospatial precueing effects as a function of age and task demands”Perception & Psychophysics38947–958.
29.
WilleyJGrayN SSnowdenR J (submitted) “Attentional cueing in schizophrenic patients: validity and alerting effects”.
