Semantic factors are presumed to have little influence on motion perception. Two experiments examined the effects of an object's semantic identity on motion correspondence using the Ternus paradigm. Motion correspondence was not influenced by whether the object depicted is typically moving or stationary, but it was influenced by the way(s) in which an object's components typically move relative to one another: perceived correspondence differed depending on whether the motion tokens constituted the feet of a person walking or the wheels of a car. Apparently, semantic knowledge can influence motion correspondence, although such influence is weak and may be restricted to certain types of semantic information. The adaptive significance of such restricted influences is considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallKSekulerR, 1980“Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception”Psychological Review87435–469
2.
BallKSekulerR, 1981“Cues reduce direction uncertainty and enhance motion detection”Perception & Psychophysics30119–128
3.
BaroJ ALevinsonE, 1988“Apparent motion can be perceived between patterns with dissimilar spatial frequencies”Vision Research281311–1313
4.
BreitmeyerB GMayJ GWilliamsM C, 1988“Spatial frequency and contrast effects on percepts of bistable stroboscopic motion”Perception & Psychophysics44525–531
5.
BurtPSperlingG, 1981“Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion”Psychological Review88171–175
6.
CascoC, 1990“The relationship between visual persistence and event perception in bistable motion display”Perception19437–445
ChenL, 1985“Topological structure in the perception of apparent motion”Perception14197–208
9.
DawsonM R W, 1989“Apparent motion and element connectedness”Spatial Vision4241–251
10.
DawsonM R W, 1991“The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem”Psychological Review98569–603
11.
DawsonM R WNevin-MeadowsNWrightR D, 1994“Polarity matching in the Ternus configuration”Vision Research343347–3359
12.
DawsonM R WWrightR D, 1994“Simultaneity in the Ternus configuration: Psychophysical data and a computer model”Vision Research34397–407
13.
DeSilvaH R, 1926“An experimental investigation of the determinants of apparent visual movement”American Journal of Psychology37469–501
14.
FarahM J, 1990Visual Agnosia (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
15.
FodorJ A, 1983The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
16.
FreydJ J, 1983“The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed”Perception & Psychophysics33575–581
FreydJ JFinkeR A, 1984“Representational momentum”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition10126–132
19.
FriedmanS LStevensonM B, 1980“Perception of movement in pictures”, in The Perception of Pictures Ed. HagenM A, (New York: Academic Press) pp 225–255
20.
GreenM, 1986“What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?”Vision Research26599–607
21.
GreenMOdomJ V, 1986“Correspondence matching in apparent motion: Evidence for three-dimensional spatial representation”Science2331427–1429
22.
HeZ JOoiT L, 1999“Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display”Perception28877–892
23.
HikosakaOMiyauchiSShimojoS, 1993“Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation”Vision Research331219–1240
24.
HubbardT LBharuchaJ J, 1988“Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion”Perception & Psychophysics44211–221
25.
JonesE EBrunerJ S, 1954“Expectancy in apparent visual movement”British Journal of Psychology45157–165
26.
KolersP A, 1972Aspects of Motion Perception (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
27.
KolersP APomerantzJ R, 1971“Figural changes in apparent motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology8799–108
28.
KowlerESteinmanR M, 1979a“The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control I: Periodic target steps”Vision Research19619–632
29.
KowlerESteinmanR M, 1979b“The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control II: Single target displacement”Vision Research19633–646
30.
KowlerESteinmanR M, 1981“The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control III: Guessing unpredictable target displacements”Vision Research21191–203
31.
McBeathM KMorikawaKKaiserM K, 1992“Perceptual bias for forward-facing motion”Psychological Science3362–367
32.
MackAKleinLHillJPalumboD, 1989“Apparent motion: Evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process”Perception & Psychophysics46201–206
33.
NakayamaJShimojoS, 1990“Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective contours from unpaired binocular points”Vision Research301811–1825
34.
NavonD, 1976“Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2130–138
35.
NeffW S, 1926“A critical investigation of the visual apprehension of movement”American Journal of Psychology481–42
36.
OrlanskyJ, 1940“The effect of similarity and difference in form on apparent visual movement”Archives of Psychology2461–88
37.
OrneN T, 1962“On the social psychology of the psychophysical experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications”American Psychologist17776–783
38.
PantleAPiccianoL, 1976“A multistable movement display: Evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision”Science193500–502
39.
PantleA JPetersikJ T, 1980“Effects of spatial parameters on the perceptual organization of a bistable motion display”Perception & Psychophysics27307–312
40.
PetersikJ T, 1984“The perceptual fate of letters in two kinds of apparent movement displays”Perception & Psychophysics36146–150
41.
PetersikJ TPantleA, 1979“Factors controlling the competing sensations produced by a bistable stroboscopic motion display”Vision Research19143–154
42.
PoggioTTorreVKochC, 1985“Computational vision and regularization theory”Nature (London)317314–319
43.
PrazdnyK, 1986“What variables control (long-range) apparent motion?”Perception1537–40
44.
PylyshynZ W, 1984Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
45.
RamachandranV S, 1990“Visual perception in people and machines”, in AI and the Eye Eds BlakeATrosciankoT, (New York: John Wiley) pp 21–77
ReedC LVinsonN G, 1996“Conceptual effects on representational momentum”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22839–850
48.
SekulerRBallK, 1977“Mental set alters visibility of moving targets”Science19860–62
49.
ShechterSHochsteinSHillmanP, 1988“Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues”Vision Research281013–1021
50.
ShepardR N, 1984“Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving imagining thinking and dreaming”Psychological Review91417–447
51.
ShiffrarMFreydJ J, 1990“Apparent motion of the human body”Psychological Science1257–264
52.
ShiffrarMFreydJ J, 1993“Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs”Psychological Science4379–384
53.
ShimojoSNakayamaK, 1990a“Amodal representation of occluded surfaces: Role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence”Perception19285–299
54.
ShimojoSNakayamaK, 1990b“Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry”Vision Research3069–80
55.
SigmanERockI, 1974“Stroboscopic movement based on perceptual intelligence”Perception39–28
56.
StelmachL BHerdmanC MMcNeilK R, 1994“Attentional modulation of visual processes in motion perception”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20108–121
57.
TernusJ, 1926/1938“The problem of phenomenal identity”, English translation in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology Ed. EllisW D, (1938, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)
58.
TochH HIttelsonW H, 1956“The role of past experience in apparent movement: A revaluation”British Journal of Psychology47195–207
59.
UllmanS, 1979The Interpretation of Visual Motion (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
60.
UllmanS, 1980“The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion”Perception9617–626
61.
VerfaillieKd'YdewalleG, 1991“Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition17302–313
62.
WatsonA B, 1986“Apparent motion occurs only between similar spatial frequencies”Vision Research261727–1730
63.
WrightR DDawsonM R W, 1994“To what extent do beliefs affect apparent motion?”Philosophical Psychology7471–491
