In this study of the informativeness of shadows for the perception of object shape, observers viewed shadows cast by a set of natural solid objects and were required to discriminate between them. In some conditions the objects underwent rotation in depth while in other conditions they remained stationary, thus producing both deforming and static shadows. The orientation of the light source casting the shadows was also varied, leading to further alterations in the shape of the shadows. When deformations in the shadow boundary were present, the observers were able to reliably recognize and discriminate between the objects, invariant over the shadow distortions produced by movements of the light source. The recognition performance for the static shadows depended critically upon the content of the specific views that were shown. These results support the idea that there are invariant features of shadow boundaries that permit the recognition of shape (cf Koenderink, 1984 Perception13 321–330).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldV I, 1984Catastrophe Theory (Berlin: Springer).
2.
AttneaveF, 1954“Some informational aspects of visual perception”Psychological Review61183–193.
3.
BerbaumKBeverTChungC S, 1984“Extending the perception of shape from known to unknown shading”Perception13479–488.
4.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147.
5.
BiedermanIGerhardsteinP C, 1993“Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance191162–1182.
6.
BiedermanIJuG, 1988“Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition”Cognitive Psychology2038–64.
7.
BraunsteinM LAndersenG J, 1984“Shape and depth perception from parallel projections of three-dimensional motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10749–760.
8.
CorteseJ MAndersenG J, 1991“Recovery of 3-D shape from deforming contours”Perception & Psychophysics49315–327.
9.
ErensR GKappersA MKoenderinkJ J, 1993“Perception of local shape from shading”Perception & Psychophysics54145–156.
10.
GombrichE H, 1995Shadows: The Depiction of Cast Shadows in Western Art (London: National Gallery Publications).
11.
GraftonC B, 1979Silhouettes: A Pictorial Archive of Varied Illustrations (New York: Dover).
12.
GreenB F, 1961“Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect”Journal of Experimental Psychology62272–282.
13.
HaywardW G, 1998“Effects of outline shape in object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24427–440.
14.
HaywardW GTarrM J, 1997“Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance231511–1521.
15.
HoffmanD DBennettB M, 1986“The computation of structure from fixed-axis motion: Rigid structures”Biological Cybernetics5471–83.
16.
HoffmanD DRichardsW A, 1984“Parts of recognition”Cognition1865–96.
17.
KerstenDKnillD CMamassianPBülthoffI, 1996“Illusory motion from shadows”Nature (London)37931.
18.
KerstenDMamassianPKnillD C, 1997“Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth”Perception26171–192.
19.
KoenderinkJ J, 1984a“What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape?”Perception13321–330.
20.
KoenderinkJ J, 1984b“The internal representation of solid shape and visual exploration”, in Sensory Experience, Adaptation, and Perception: Festschrift for Ivo Kohler Eds SpillmannLWootenB R (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 123–142.
21.
KoenderinkJ J, 1990Solid Shape (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
22.
KoenderinkJ Jvan DoornA J, 1976“The singularities of the visual mapping”Biological Cybernetics2451–59.
23.
KoenderinkJ Jvan DoornA J, 1978“How an ambulant observer can construct a model of the environment from the geometrical structure of the visual inflow”, in Kybernetik 1977 Eds HauskeGButenandtE (Munich: Oldenbourg) pp 224–247.
24.
LuceR D, 1963“Detection and recognition”, in Handbook of Mathematical Psychologyvolume 1, Eds LuceR DBushR RGalanterE (New York: John Wiley) pp 103–189.
25.
MingollaEToddJ T, 1986“Perception of solid shape from shading”Biological Cybernetics53137–151.
26.
NormanJ FLappinJ S, 1992“The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion”Perception & Psychophysics51386–396.
27.
NormanJ FToddJ T, 1994“Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20343–356.
28.
NormanJ FToddJ TPhillipsF, 1995“The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information”Perception & Psychophysics57629–636.
29.
RichardsW AKoenderinkJ JHoffmanD D, 1987“Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes”Journal of the Optical Society of America A41168–1175.
30.
SinghMSeyranianG DHoffmanD D, 1999“Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule”Perception & Psychophysics61636–660.
31.
TarrM J, 1995“Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review255–82.
32.
TjanB SBrajeW LLeggeG EKerstenD, 1995“Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise”Vision Research353053–3069.
33.
ToddJ T, 1985“Perception of structure from motion: Is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance11689–710.
34.
ToddJ TAkerstromR AReichelF DHayesW, 1988“Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors”Perception & Psychophysics43179–188.
35.
UllmanS, 1979The Interpretation of Visual Motion (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
36.
Van EffelterreT, 1994“Aspect graphs for visual recognition of three-dimensional objects”Perception23563–582.
37.
da VinciL, 1989“Light and shade”, in Leonardo on Painting Ed. KempM (London: Yale University Press) pp 88–115.
38.
WallachHO'ConnellD N, 1953“The kinetic depth effect”Journal of Experimental Psychology45205–217.
