In reply to Parks' interpretation of Rock's cognitive theory of illusory figures, we maintain our point of view that such a theory has limited heuristic and explanatory power because it fails to predict subjects' responses in psychophysical tasks. As a result, the theoretical framework defended by Parks is not appropriate for suggesting candidate mechanisms of brain – behaviour function that could underly the phenomenal emergence of such figures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttneaveF, 1950“Dimensions of similarity”American Journal of Psychology63516–556
2.
DrespB, 1992“Local brightness mechanisms sketch out surfaces but do not fill them in. Evidence in the Kanizsa Square”Perception & Psychophysics52562–570
3.
DrespB, 1997“On illusory contours and their functional significance”Current Psychology of Cognition16489–517
4.
DrespBLorenceauJBonnetC, 1990“Apparent brightness enhancement in the Kanizsa square with and without illusory contour formation”Perception19483–489
5.
DrespBSalvano-PardieuVBonnetC, 1996“Illusory form from inducers with opposite contrast polarity: Evidence for multi-stage integration”Perception & Psychophysics58111–124
6.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985“Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations”Perception & Psychophysics38141–171
7.
von der HeydtRPeterhansE, 1989“Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity”Journal of Neuroscience91731–1748
8.
LesherGWMingollaE, 1993“The role of edges and line-ends in the formation of illusory contours”Vision Research332253–2270
9.
LivingstoneMHubelD, 1988“Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology and perception”Science240740–749
10.
PeterhansEvon der HeydtR, 1989“Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps”Journal of Neuroscience91749–1763
11.
RamachandranVS, 1987“Visual perception of surfaces: A biological theory”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerGE (New York: Springer) pp 109–115
12.
RockIAnsonR, 1979“Illusory contours as the solution to a problem”Perception8906–918
13.
ShapleyRGordonJ, 1987“The existence of interpolated illusory contours depends on contrast and spatial separation”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerGE (New York: Springer) pp 109–115
14.
ShipleyTFKellmanPJ, 1992“Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length”Perception & Psychophysics5297–106
15.
SiegelSPetryS, 1991“Evidence for independent processing of subjective contour brightness and sharpness”Perception20233–241
16.
SpillmannLDrespB, 1995“Phenomena of illusory form: Can we bridge the gap between levels of explanation?”Perception241333–1364
17.
SpillmannLEhrensteinW, 1996“From neuron to Gestalt: Mechanisms of visual perception”, in Comprehensive Human Physiology volume I, Eds GregerRWindhorstU (New York: Springer) pp 861–893
