We present a demonstration of word perception in which stimuli containing very few letters (just 50% of their original number) are presented for unlimited durations and yet are seen unequivocally as complete words. The phenomenon suggests that recognition of words can be achieved even when perception of their component letters is prevented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenP AWallaceBWeberT A, 1995“Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21914–934
2.
EvettL JHumphreysG W, 1981“The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A33325–350
3.
HumphreysG WEvettL JQuinlanP T, 1990“Orthographic processing in visual word identification”Cognitive Psychology22517–560
4.
JordanT R, 1990“Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmark boundaries”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16893–909
5.
JordanT R, 1995“Perceiving exterior letters of words: Differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter fragment masks”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21512–530
6.
JordanT RScott-BrownK C, 1999“Superiority effects with filtered strings: Evidence for coarse visual cues in word recognition”, paper presented at the July meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, University of Durham, Durham, UK
7.
MayallKHumphreysG W, 1996“Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22278–294
8.
MayallKHumphreysG WOlsonA, 1997“Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition231275–1286
9.
NeisserU, 1967Cognitive Psychology (New York: Appleton-Century Crofts)
10.
PaapK RNewsomeS LNoelR W, 1984“Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10413–428
11.
PillsburyW B, 1897“A study in apperception”American Journal of Psychology8315–393
12.
PolkT AFarahM J, 1997“A simple common contexts explanation for the development of abstract letter identities”Neural Computation91277–1289
13.
RappBCaramazzaA, 1997“From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance231130–1152
14.
WoodworthR S, 1938Experimental Psychology (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston)
