In the 1920s Max Wertheimer enunciated a credo of Gestalt theory: the properties of any of the parts are governed by the structural laws of the whole. Intense efforts at the time to discover these laws had only very limited success. Psychology was in the grips of the Fechnerian tradition to seek exact relationships between the material and the mental and, because the Gestalt movement could not deliver these, it never attained a major standing among students of perception. However, as neurophysiological research into cortical processing of visual stimuli progresses the need for organizing principles is increasingly making itself felt. Concepts like contour salience and figure segregation, once the province of Gestalt psychology, are now taking on renewed significance as investigators combine neural modeling and psychophysical approaches with electrophysiological ones to characterize neural mechanisms of cognition. But it would be perilous not to take heed of some of the lessons that the history of the Gestalt movement teaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshM G, 1995Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
BlachowskiS, 1913“Studien uber den Binnenkontrast”Zeitschrift fur Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane67 Abt. ii, 291–330
4.
ChapanisAMcClearyR A, 1953“Interposition as a cue for the perception of relative distance”Journal of General Psychology48113–132
5.
von EhrenfelsC, 1890“Ueber Gestaltqualitaten”, reprinted in Gestalthaftes Sehen Ed. WeinhandelF (1967, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) pp 11–43
6.
FechnerG T, 1860Elemente der Psychophysik(Leipzig: Breitkopf und Hártel)
7.
FieldD JHayesAHessR F, 1993“Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local ‘association field’”Vision Research33173–193
8.
GibsonJ J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin)
9.
GilbertC D, 1992“Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics”Neuron91–13
10.
GilbertC DWieselT N, 1990“The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat”Vision Research301689–1701
11.
GrahamC H, 1951“Visual perception”, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology Ed. StevensS S(New York: John Wiley)
12.
GrahamC H, 1965Vision and Visual Perception(New York: John Wiley)
13.
HeringE, 1906“Antwortrede” in Fünf Reden Ed. HeringH E (1921, Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann) p. 135
14.
HochbergJ, 1971“Perception”, in Experimental Psychology Eds KlingJ WRiggsL A (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston)
15.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1968“Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)166106–154
16.
KapadiaM KItoMGilbertC DWestheimerG, 1995“Improvement of visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys”Neuron15843–856
KleinF, 1872“Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen” (Erlanger Programm), in Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungenvolume 1 (1921, Berlin: Springer)
19.
KöhlerW, 1929Gestalt Psychology(New York: Horace Liverwright) p. 192
20.
KovacsIJuleszB, 1993“A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure – ground segmentation”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA907495–7497
21.
KufflerS W, 1953“Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina”Journal of Neurophysiology1637–68
22.
MachE, 1886Beitrage zur Analyse der Empfindungen(Jena: G Fischer) English translation by WilliamsC M of first German edition (1897, Chicago, IL: Open Court)
23.
PettetM WMcKeeS PGrzywaczN M, 1998“Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection”Vision Research38865–879
24.
PolatUSagiD, 1993“Lateral interactions between spatial channels: suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments”Vision Research33993–999
25.
RatliffF, 1965Mach Bands: Quantitative Studies on Neural Networks in the Retina(New York: Holden-Day)
26.
RatooshP, 1949“On interposition as a cue for the perception of distance”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA35257–259
27.
SekulerR, 1996“Motion perception: a modern view of Wertheimer's 1912 monograph”Perception251243–1258
28.
UllmanS, 1990“Three-dimensional object recognition”Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology50889–898
29.
UttalW R, 1975An Autocorrelation Theory of Form Perception(Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
30.
WertheimerM, 1912“Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegungen”Zeitschrift fur Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane61161–265 [reprinted in Drei Abhandlungen zur Gestalttheorie (1967, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) pp 1–105]
31.
WertheimerM, 1923“Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt”Psychologische Forschung4301–350 [condensed and translated as “Laws of organization in perceptual forms”, in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology Ed. EllisW D (1938, New York: Harcourt Brace) pp 71–88]
32.
WertheimerM, 1924“Ueber Gestalttheorie”, Lecture before the Kant Gesellschaft [reprinted in translation in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology Ed. EllisW D (1938, New York: Harcourt, Brace) pp 1–11]
