When a small frontoparallel surface (a test strip) is surrounded by a larger slanted surface (an inducer), the test strip is perceived as slanted in the direction opposite to the inducer. This has been called the depth-contrast effect, but we call it the slant-contrast effect. In nearly all demonstrations of this effect, the inducer's slant is specified by stereoscopic signals; and other signals, such as the texture gradient, specify that it is frontoparallel. We present a theory of slant estimation that determines surface slant via linear combination of various slant estimators; the weight of each estimator is proportional to its reliability. The theory explains slant contrast because the absolute slant of the inducer and the relative slant between test strip and inducer are both estimated with greater reliability than the absolute slant of the test strip. The theory predicts that slant contrast will be eliminated if the signals specifying the inducer's slant are consistent with one another. It also predicts reversed slant contrast if the inducer's slant is specified by nonstereoscopic signals rather than by stereo signals. These predictions were tested and confirmed in three experiments. The first showed that slant contrast is greatly reduced when the stereo-specified and nonstereo-specified slants of the inducer are made consistent with one another. The second showed that slant contrast is eliminated altogether when the stimulus consists of real planes rather than images on a display screen. The third showed that slant contrast is reversed when the nonstereo-specified slant of the inducer varies and the stereo-specified slant is zero. We conclude that slant contrast is a byproduct of the visual system's reconciliation of conflicting information while it attempts to determine surface slant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnstisS M, 1975“What does visual perception tell us about visual coding?”, in Handbook of Psychobiology Eds BlakemoreCGazzanigaM S (New York: Academic Press) pp 269–323
2.
AnstisS MHowardI PRogersB, 1978“A Craik–O'Brien–Cornsweet illusion for visual depth”Vision Research18213–217
3.
BackusB TBanksM S, 1999“Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception”Perception28217–242
4.
BackusB TBanksM Svan EeRCrowellJ A, 1999“Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception”Vision Research391143–1170
5.
BanksM SBackusB T, 1998“Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect”Vision Research38187–194
6.
BrookesAStevensK A, 1989“The analogy between stereo depth and brightness”Perception18601–614
7.
BuckleyDFrisbyJ P, 1993“Interaction of stereo, texture, and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges”Vision Research33919–933
8.
ClarkeJ JYuilleA L, 1990Data Fusion for Sensory Information Processing Systems (Boston, MA: Kluwer)
9.
EbenholtzS MPaapK R, 1973“The constancy of object orientation: Compensation for ocular rotation”Perception & Psychophysics14458–470
10.
van EeR, 1995Stability of Binocular Depth Perception (Utrecht: Utrecht University)
11.
VanEe RErkelensC J, 1996a“Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception”Vision Research3643–51
12.
van EeRErkelensC J, 1996b“Anisotropy in Werner's binocular depth contrast effect”Vision Research362253–2262
13.
van EeRErkelensC J, 1996c“Stability of binocular depth perception with moving head and eyes”Vision Research363827–3842
14.
ErkelensC Jvan EeR, 1998“A computational model of depth perception based on headcentric disparity”Vision Research382999–3018
15.
FahleMWestheimerG, 1988“Local and global factors in disparity detection of rows of points”Vision Research28171–178
16.
GillamB, 1967“Changes in the direction of induced aniseikonic slant as a function of distance”Vision Research7777–783
17.
GillamBChambersDRussoT, 1988“Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14163–175
18.
GillamBFlaggTFinlayD, 1984“Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing”Perception & Psychophysics36559–564
GillamBRyanC, 1992“Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception”Perception21427–439
21.
GogelW C, 1956“The tendency to see objects as equidistant and its inverse relation to lateral separation”Psychological Monographs70 (whole number 411) 1–17
22.
GrahamM ERogersB J, 1982“Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion-parallax and stereoscopic information”Perception11247–262
23.
HarkerG S, 1962“Apparent frontoparallel plane, stereoscopic correspondence, and induced cyclorotation of the eyes”Perceptual and Motor Skills1475–87
24.
HowardI PKanekoH, 1994“Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination”Vision Research342505–2517
25.
HowardI POhmiMSunL, 1993“Cyclovergence: A comparison of objective and psychophysical measurements”Experimental Brain Research97349–355
26.
HowardI PRogersB J, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (New York: Oxford University Press)
27.
JohnstonE BCummingB GParkerA J, 1993“Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture”Vision Research33813–826
28.
KumarTGlaserD A, 1991“Influence of remote objects on local depth perception”Vision Research311687–1699
29.
KumarTGlaserD A, 1992“Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception”Vision Research32499–512
30.
KumarTGlaserD A, 1993“Temporal aspects of depth contrast”Vision Research33947–957
31.
LandyM SMaloneyL TJohnstonE BYoungM, 1995“Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion”Vision Research35389–412
32.
MayhewJ ELonguet-HigginsH C, 1982“A computational model of binocular depth perception”Nature (London)297376–378
33.
MitchisonG JMcKeeS P, 1990“Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception”Vision Research301781–1791
34.
MitchisonG JWestheimerG, 1984“The perception of depth in simple figures”Vision Research241063–1073
35.
MitchisonG JWestheimerG, 1990“Viewing geometry and gradients of horizontal disparity”, in Vision: Coding and Efficiency Ed. BlakemoreC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 302–309
36.
NelsonJ, 1977“The plasticity of correspondence: after-effects, illusions and horopter shifts in depth perception”Journal of Theoretical Biology66203–266
37.
OgleK N, 1938“Induced size effect. I. A new phenomenon in binocular space perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes”Archives of Ophthalmology20604–623
38.
OgleK N, 1946“The binocular depth contrast phenomenon”American Journal of Psychology59111–126
39.
PastoreN, 1964“Induction of stereoscopic depth effect”Science144888
40.
PastoreNTerwilligerM, 1966“Induction of stereoscopic depth effects”British Journal of Psychology57201–202
41.
PierceB JHowardI PFeresinC, 1998“Depth interactions between inclined and slanted surfaces in vertical and horizontal orientations”Perception2787–103
42.
PorrillJMayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1990“Cyclotorsion, conformal invariance, and induced effects in stereoscopic vision”, in Image Understanding Eds UlmanSRichardsW (Norwood, NJ: Ablex) pp 185–196
43.
RichardsW, 1972“Response functions for sine- and square-wave modulations of disparity”Journal of the Optical Society of America62907–911
44.
RogersB JBradshawM, 1995“Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces”Perception24155–179
45.
RogersB JGrahamM E, 1983“Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces”Science2211409–1411
46.
RyanCGillamB, 1994“Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes”Perception23645–658
47.
SatoMHowardI P, 1999“Effects of perspective on stereoscopic depth contrast of inclined surfaces”Vision Research submitted
48.
SedgwickH A, 1986“Space perception”, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performancevolume 1Sensory Processes and Perception Eds BoffK RKaufmanLThomasJ P (New York: John Wiley) pp 21–1–21–57
49.
SchumerR AGanzL, 1979“Independent stereoscopic channels for different extents of spatial pooling”Vision Research191303–1314
50.
StevensK A, 1983“Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation”Biological Cybernetics46183–195
51.
StevensK ABrookesA, 1988“Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces”Vision Research28371–386
52.
StevensonS BCormackL KSchorC M, 1991“Depth attraction and repulsion in random dot stereograms”Vision Research31805–813
53.
WernerH, 1937“Dynamical theory of depth perception”Psychological Monographs491–127
54.
WernerH, 1938“Binocular depth-contrast and the conditions of the binocular field”American Journal of Psychology51489–497
55.
WestheimerGLeviD M, 1987“Depth attraction and repulsion of disparate foveal stimuli”Vision Research271361–1368
