Three pairs of experiments were conducted to investigate the importance of spatial-frequency-processing delays imposed by the visual system on the efficacy of their subsequent integration. In the first pair of experiments filtered versions of a natural image were found to be easily discriminable from the full-bandwidth image. These images were then placed into triplets and presented sequentially. Subjects were required to detect the presence of a full-bandwidth target image within the sequence. As with previous results a low-to-high progression of spatial-frequency information did increase the number of errors of full-bandwidth-image detection within the triplets where it was not present. However, this was not found across all conditions and was suggested to be due to the increased discriminability of the constituent images which form the image triplets. The second experiment was a repetition of the first with more confusable component images. Again the weak order effect on target detection was found. It was suggested that this may be due to the nature of the stimulus used. The third pair of experiments repeated the design of the first pair of experiments but with Gabor patches which provide localised spatial-frequency information. It was found that a low-to-high progression of spatial frequencies resulted in more false detections of the target. The results are interpreted as supporting an integration mechanism which operates with greater efficacy when the presentation of spatial-frequency information mirrors that naturally imposed by the neural delays involved in the processing of spatial frequencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsadaHBradyM, 1986“The curvature primal sketch”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence82–14
2.
BarrJ M, 1986A Study of Visual Detection Latency Using Spatial Frequency Stimuli DPhil thesis, University of Oxford
3.
BlakemoreCCampbellF W, 1969“On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images”Journal of Physiology (London)203237–260
4.
BreitmeyerB G, 1975“Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels”Vision Research151411–1412
5.
BreitmeyerB, 1984Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
6.
BurtP JAdelsonE H, 1983“The Laplacian pyramid as a compact code”IEEE Transactions on Communications31532–540
7.
CampbellF WRobsonJ G, 1968“Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings”Journal of Physiology (London)197551–566
8.
DeValoisR LDeValoisK K, 1988Spatial Vision (New York: Oxford University Press)
9.
FerreroMFosterD H, 1986“Discrete and continuous modes of curved-line discrimination controlled by effective stimulus duration”Spatial Vision1219–230
10.
FieldD J, 1987“Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells”Journal of the Optical Society of America A42379–2394
11.
FieldD JHayesAHessR F, 1993“Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local association field”Vision Research33173–193
12.
FlavellJ HDragunsJ, 1957“A microgenetic approach to perception and thought”Psychological Bulletin54197–217
GishKShulmanG LSheehyJ BLeibowitzH W, 1986“Reaction times to different spatial frequencies as a function of detectability”Vision Research26745–748
15.
GrahamN V S, 1980“Spatial frequency channels in human vision: Detecting edges without edge detectors”, in Visual Coding and Adaptability Ed. HarrisC S (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 215–262
16.
GrahamN, 1989Visual Pattern Analyzers (New York: Oxford University Press)
17.
HarwerthR SLeviD M, 1978“Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection”Vision Research181579–1586
18.
HenningG BHertzB GBroadbentD E, 1975“Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyzes patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency”Vision Research15887–899
19.
HessR FDakinS C, 1997“Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision”Nature (London)390602–604
20.
HughesH C, 1986“Asymmetric interference between components of suprathreshold compound gratings”Perception & Psychophysics40241–250
21.
HughesH CNozawaGKitterleF, 1996“Global precedence, spatial frequency channels and the statistics of natural images”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8197–230
22.
KoenderinkJ J, 1984“The structure of images”Biological Cybernetics50363–370
23.
LambM RYundE W, 1996“Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms”Perception & Psychophysics58363–373
24.
LeggeG E, 1978“Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: temporal and sustained properties”Vision Research1869–81
25.
LennieP, 1993“Role of M and P pathways”, in Contrast Sensitivity Eds ShapleyR MLamD K-L (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 201–213
26.
LindebergT, 1993“Detecting salient blob-like image structures and their scales with a scale-space primal sketch: A method for focus-of-attention”International Journal of Computer Vision11283–318
27.
LuppUHauskeGWolfW, 1976“Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings”Vision Research16969–972
28.
MarrD, 1982Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
29.
MarrDPoggioT, 1979“A computational theory of human stereo vision”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B204301–328
30.
NachmiasJSansburyRVassilevAWeberA, 1973“Adaptation to square-wave gratings: in search of the elusive third harmonic”Vision Research131335–1342
31.
NachmiasJWeberA, 1975“Discrimination of simple and complex gratings”Vision Research15217–223
32.
NavonD, 1977“Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception”Cognitive Psychology9353–383
33.
OlivaASchynsP G, 1997“Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli”Cognitive Psychology2472–107
34.
PalagiP MGuerin-DugueA, 1995“An architecture for texture segmentation: From energy features to region detection”, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (New York: Springer) Part 930, pp 956–962
35.
ParkerD M, 1980“Simple reaction times to the onset, offset and contrast reversal of sinusoidal grating stimuli”Perception & Psychophysics28365–368
36.
ParkerD MDutchS, 1987“Perceptual latency and spatial frequency”Vision Research271279–1284
37.
ParkerD MLishmanJ RHughesJ, 1992“Temporal integration of spatially filtered visual images”Perception21147–160
38.
ParkerD MLishmanJ RHughesJ, 1996“Role of coarse and fine spatial information in face and object processing”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance221448–1466
39.
ParkerD MLishmanJ RHughesJ, 1997“Evidence for the view that temporospatial integration in vision is temporally anisotropic”Perception261169–1180
40.
ParkerD MSalzenE A, 1977“Latency changes in the human visual-evoked response to sinusoidal gratings”Vision Research171201–1204
41.
ParkerD MSalzenE A, 1982“Evoked potentials and reaction times to the offset and contrast reversal of sinusoidal gratings”Vision Research22205–207
42.
PlantG TZimmernR LDurdenK, 1983“Transient visually evoked potentials to the pattern reversal and onset of sinusoidal gratings”Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology56147–158
43.
PolatUSagiD, 1993“Lateral interactions between spatial channels: suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments”Vision Research33993–999
44.
PolatUSagiD, 1994“The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions”Vision Research3473–78
45.
RudermanD L, 1997“Origins of scaling in natural images”Vision Research373385–3398
46.
SchaafAVan derVan HaterenJ H, 1996“Modelling the power spectra of natural images: statistics and information”Vision Research362759–2770
47.
SchynsP GOlivaA, 1994“From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time and spatial scale dependent scene recognition”Psychological Science5195–200
48.
SchynsP GOlivaA, 1997“Flexible, diagnosticity-driven rather than fixed, perceptually determined scale selection in scene and face recognition”Perception261027–1038
49.
StromeyerC FIIIJuleszB, 1972“Spatial frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking”Journal of the Optical Society of America621221–1232
50.
TolhurstD J, 1975“Reaction times in the detection of gratings by human observers: a probabilistic mechanism”Vision Research151143–1149
51.
TolhurstD JBarfieldL P, 1978“Interactions between spatial frequency channels”Vision Research18951–958
52.
TolhurstD JTadmorYChaoT, 1992“Amplitude spectra of natural images”Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics12229–232
53.
WatsonA BNachmiasJ, 1977“Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings”Vision Research17893–902
54.
WattR J, 1987“Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus”Journal of the Optical Society of America A42006–2021
55.
WattR J, 1988Visual Processing: Computational, Psychophysical and Cognitive Research (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
56.
WilliamsonS JKaufmanLBrennerD, 1978“Latency of the neuromagnetic response of the human visual cortex”Vision Research18107–110
