Previous research has demonstrated global dominance for attended and unattended stimuli. In this paper, this phenomenon is shown to be restricted to small compound stimuli. As a first step, local dominance was obtained with large (8 deg in height) attended stimuli when a single stimulus was displayed. Next, dominance in attended and unattended stimuli was investigated by displaying two large compound stimuli, one surrounded by a square (attended compound stimulus), the other one enclosed in a circle (unattended compound stimulus). The way attention was directed to the attended stimulus was varied. No dominance was observed when subjects were instructed to process the stimulus appearing in the square (experiment 2). However, when a rapid-onset cue pre-directed attention to the attended stimulus, local dominance emerged for attended, but not for unattended stimuli (experiment 3). This latter result was obtained whether or not subjects were more experienced at local than global processing (experiment 4). The implications of the results for the locus of processing dominance are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoerL CKeussP J G, 1982“Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed – accuracy tradeoff functions”Perception & Psychophysics31358–366
2.
BoucartMHumphreysG W, 1994“Attention to orientation, size, luminance and color: Attentional failure within the form domain”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2061–80
3.
BriandK A, 1994“Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: Alternative measures of nontarget processing”Perception & Psychophysics55562–574
4.
CastielloUUmiltaC, 1990“Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing”Acta Psychologica73195–209
5.
CastielloUUmiltaC, 1992“Splitting focal attention”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18837–848
6.
EriksenC WSt JamesJ D, 1986“Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model”Perception & Psychophysics40225–240
7.
GarnerW R, 1983“Asymmetric interactions of stimulus dimensions in perceptual information processing”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Perception and Cognition Ed. TigheT (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 1–38
8.
GriceG RCanhamLBoroughsJ M, 1983“Forest before trees? It depends where you look”Perception & Psychophysics33121–128
9.
HughesH CFendrichRReuter-LorenzP A, 1990“Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience2272–282
HughesH CNozawaGKitterleF, 1996“Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8197–230
12.
HumphreysG WBoucartM, 1997“Selection by color and form in vision”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23136–153
13.
KimchiR, 1992“The primacy of holistic processing and the global/local paradigm: A critical review”Psychological Bulletin11224–38
14.
KinchlaR ASolis-MaciaVHoffmanJ, 1983“Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image”Perception & Psychophysics331–10
15.
KinchlaR AWolfeJ M, 1979“The order of visual processing: Top–down, bottom–up, or middle–out”Perception & Psychophysics25225–231
16.
LabergeD, 1983“Spatial extent of attention to letters and words”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9371–379
17.
LambM RRobertsonL C, 1990“The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented”Perception & Psychophysics47489–496
18.
MillerJ, 1981“Global precedence in attention and decision”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance71161–1174
19.
NavonD, 1977“Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception”Cognitive Psychology9353–383
20.
NavonD, 1981“The forest revisited: More on global precedence”Psychological Research431–32
21.
NavonD, 1991“Testing a queue hypothesis for processing of global and local information”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General120173–189
22.
PalmerTTzengO J LHeS, 1995“Local-level and global-level form characteristics in apparent-motion correspondence”Perception241233–1245
23.
PaquetL, 1991“Prédominance du tout dans la reconnaissance d'objets: Artefact ou règle du traitement”Canadian Journal of Psychology4537–53
24.
PaquetL, 1992“Global and local processing in nonattended objects: A failure to induce local processing dominance”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18512–529
25.
PaquetL, 1994“Does the attentional state determine processing dominance in to-be-ignored compound stimuli?”Acta Psychologica85155–169
26.
PaquetL, 1999“Global dominance outside the focus of attention”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A52465–485
27.
PaquetLCraigG L, 1997“Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flanker task”Memory and Cognition25182–189
28.
PaquetLLortieC, 1990“Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors”Perception & Psychophysics48382–388
29.
PaquetLMerikleP M, 1988“Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1489–100
30.
PaquetLWuY, 1994“Global dominance in to-be-ignored compound stimuli: The influence of attentional set”Current Psychology of Cognition13169–188
31.
PomerantzJ R, 1983“Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General112516–540
32.
PosnerM I, 1980“Orienting of attention”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology323–25
ShulmanG LSullivanM AGishKSakodaW J, 1986“The role of spatial-frequency channels in the perception of local and global structure”Perception15259–274
35.
StofferT H, 1994“Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: Effect of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset”Psychological Research5683–98
36.
TheeuwesJ, 1995“Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not”Perception & Psychophysics57637–644
37.
YantisSJonidesJ, 1984“Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10601–621
38.
WardL M, 1982“Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance8562–581
