To compare transparent motion and kinetic boundaries with unidirectional motion, in many studies the relative motion is generated by superimposing or adjoining unidirectional motions oriented in opposite directions. The presumption, tacitly underlying this comparison, is that the two oppositely directed velocities are independent of one another as far as their speed is concerned, ie the speed of the relative motion is presumed to be equivalent to the speed of the unidirectional components. Here we report that the relative motion between dots moving in opposite directions augments perceived speed. A constant-stimuli procedure was used to pair transparent-motion or kinetic-boundary displays with unidirectional motion, and human observers were asked to match the speed of the relative and unidirectional motions. The results show that transparency and kinetic boundaries increase the perceived visual speed by about 50%, compared with the speed of the individual components.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenG J, 1989“Perception of three-dimensional structure from optic flow without locally smooth velocity”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15363–371
2.
BerkleyM ADe BruynBOrbanG A, 1994“Illusory, motion, and luminance-defined contours interact in the human visual system”Vision Research34209–216
3.
BraddickO J, 1993“Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing”Trends in the Neurosciences16263–268
4.
BradleyD CQianNAndersenR A, 1995“Integration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques”Nature (London)373609–611
5.
ClarkeP G H, 1977“Subjective standstill caused by interaction of moving patterns”Vision Research171234
6.
ClearyRBraddickO J, 1990“Masking of low frequency information in short-range apparent motion”Vision Research30303–316
7.
De BruynB, 1995“Asymmetric spatial distributions of motion vectors yield characteristic errors in direction judgements”Vision Research351541–1545
8.
De BruynB, 1997“Blending transparent motion patterns in peripheral vision”Vision Research37645–648
9.
De BruynB, 1998“The effect of stereoscopic depth on the perceived speed of transparent motions”Perception27Supplement, 187 (Abstract)
10.
De BruynBOrbanG A, 1988“Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns”Vision Research281323–1335
11.
De BruynBOrbanG A, 1989“Discrimination of opposite directions measured with stroboscopically illuminated random-dot patterns”Journal of the Optical Society of America A6323–328
12.
De BruynBOrbanG A, 1993“Segregation of spatially superimposed optic flow components”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance191014–1027
13.
van DoornA JKoenderinkJ Jvan der GrindW, 1985“Perception of movement and correlation in stroboscopically presented noise patterns”Perception14209–224
14.
HowardI PRogersB J, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
15.
JasinschiRRosenfeldAAraujoH J, 1993“The interaction of luminance, velocity, and shape information in the perception of motion transparency, coherence, and non-rigid motion”Spatial Vision7149–182
16.
JuleszBJohnsonS C, 1968“Stereograms portraying ambiguous perceivable surfaces”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA61437–441
17.
McConkieA BFarberJ M, 1979“Relation between perceived depth and perceived motion in uniform flow fields”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5501–508
18.
McKeeS P, 1981“A local mechanism for differential velocity detection”Vision Research21491–500
19.
MarshakWSekulerR, 1979“Mutual repulsion between moving targets”Science2051399–1401
20.
MatherGMouldenB, 1983“Thresholds for movement direction: Two directions are less detectable than one”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A35513–518
21.
NawrotMSekulerR, 1990“Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: explorations in cooperativity”Vision Research301439–1451
22.
NoestA Jvan den BergA V, 1993“The role of early mechanisms in motion transparency and coherence”Spatial Vision7125–147
23.
ParkerA JYangY, 1989“Spatial properties of disparity pooling in human stereo vision”Vision Research291525–1538
24.
PollardS BFrisbyJ P, 1990“Transparency and the uniqueness constraint in human and computer stereo vision”Nature (London)347553–556
25.
QianNAndersenR AAdelsonE H, 1994“Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modelling”Journal of Neuroscience147381–7392
26.
RaymondJ EIsaakM, 1998“Successive episodes produce direction contrast effects in motion perception”Vision Research38579–589
27.
Reinhardt-RutlandA H, 1988“Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview”Psychological Bulletin10357–71
28.
SnowdenR J, 1989“Motions in orthogonal directions are mutually suppressive”Journal of the Optical Society of America A61096–1101
29.
SnowdenR JTreueSEricksonR GAndersenR A, 1991“The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion”Journal of Neuroscience112768–2785
30.
WishartK ABraddickO J, 1998“Direction repulsion in transparent and segregated motions”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39(4) S1076
