Abstract
The ‘direct-perception’ model of heading perception posits that heading is computed directly from optic flow without an intervening structural representation of environmental layout. Here, I give an example in which such a representation is seen to play a role in the interpretation of optic flow. Manipulating the outline of concave objects to give an erroneous percept of convexity caused the perceived direction of heading during a simulated approach to change as well. Thus, the representation of environmental structure provides the context for using and interpreting image motion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
