Examples are presented which are not readily explained by the hypothesis that illusory figures represent cognition solutions to a visual problem, but are more likely to stem from a process where local features play an important role.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision (New York: Springer)
3.
ParksT E, 1986“Illusory figures, illusory objects and real objects”Psychological Review93207–215
4.
ParksT ERockI, 1990“Illusory contours from pictorially three-dimensional inducing elements”Perception19119–121
5.
PurghéF, 1993“Illusory contours from pictorially three-dimensional inducing elements: Counter-evidence for Parks and Rock's example”Perception22809–818
6.
RamachandranV S, 1986“Capture of stereopsis and apparent motion by illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics39361–373
7.
RockIAnsonR, 1979“Illusory contours as the solution to a problem”Perception8665–681