A random-dot field undergoing counterphase flicker paradoxically appears to move in the same direction as head and eye movements, ie opposite to the optic-flow field. The effect is robust and occurs over a wide range of flicker rates and pixel sizes. The phenomenon can be explained by reversed phi motion caused by apparent pixel movement between successive retinal images. The reversed motion provides a positive feedback control of the display, whereas under normal conditions retinal signals provide a negative feedback. This altered polarity invokes self-sustaining eye movements akin to involuntary optokinetic nystagmus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnstisS M, 1970“Phi movement as a subtraction process”Vision Research101411–1430.
2.
AnstisS MRogersB J, 1975“Illusory reversal of depth and movement during changes of contrast”Vision Research15957–961.
3.
BehrensFGrüsserO-J, 1979“Smooth pursuit eye movements and optokinetic nystagmus elicited by intermittently illuminated stationary patterns”Experimental Brain Research37317–336.
4.
BurrD CRossJMorroneC, 1986“A spatial illusion from motion rivalry”Perception1559–66.
5.
CarpenterR H S, 1977Movements of the Eyes (London: Pion).
6.
CavanaghPAnstisS M, 1991“The contribution of color to motion in normal and color-deficient observers”Vision Research312109–2148.
7.
van DieGCollewijnH, 1982“Optokinetic nystagmus in man”Human Neurobiology1111–119.
8.
FenderD HNyeP W, 1961“An investigation of the mechanism of eye movement control”Kybernetik181–88.
9.
HowardI POhmiM, 1984“The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus”Vision Research24969–976.
10.
MacKayD M, 1961“The visual effects of non-redundant stimulation”Nature (London)192739–740.
11.
MacKayD M, 1965“Visual noise as a tool of research”Journal of General Psychology72181–197.
12.
MurasugiC MHowardI POhmiM, 1986“Optokinetic nystagmus: The effects of stationary edges, alone and in combination with central occlusion”Vision Research261155–1162.
13.
MurasugiC MHowardI POhmiM, 1989“Human optokinetic nystagmus: Competition between stationary and moving displays”Perception & Psychophysics45137–144.
14.
NewsomeW BParéE B, 1988“A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT)”Journal of Neuroscience82201–2211.
15.
RamachandranV SGregoryR L, 1978“Does colour provide an input to human motion perception?”Nature New Biology27555–57.
16.
RamachandranV SInadaV, 1985“Spatial phase and frequency in motion capture of random-dot patterns”Spatial Vision157–67.
17.
RobinsonD A, 1965“The mechanics of human smooth pursuit movements”Journal of Physiology (London)180569–591.
18.
SchorCNarayanV, 1981“The influence of field size upon the spatial frequency response of optokinetic nystagmus”Vision Research21985–994.
