Subjects matched the brightness of test patches whose inner (adjacent) surrounds appeared either as transparent overlays on a wider background that included the test patch or as regions differing in reflectance from the test patch and the outer surround. In the above configurations the luminance and spatial extent of the inner surround was identical, thus controlling for the effects of surround luminance. Configuration condition had a significant effect on test-patch brightness. In general, test-patch brightness was significantly elevated under conditions favouring the interpretation of the stimulus as including a transparent overlay. The largest effect occurred for the configuration in which the perception of transparency was supported by stereo depth cues. The brightness effect was mediated by the virtual transmittance of the transparent overlay, increasing in magnitude with decreasing transmittance. Further, the effect of transparency on brightness was greatest for test-patch luminances near to those of their immediate surrounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonE H, 1993“Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness”Science2622042–2044.
BlakesleeBMcCourtM E, 1996“Does a single mechanism underlie simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction?”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Supplement371066.
7.
BuckleyDFrisbyJ PFreemanJ, 1994“Lightness perception can be affected by surface curvature from stereopsis”Perception23869–881.
8.
DalbyT ASaillantM LWootenB R, 1995“The relation of lightness and stereoscopic depth in a simple viewing situation”Perception & Psychophysics57318–332.
9.
FiorentiniABaumgartnerGMagnussenSSchillerP HThomasJ P, 1990“The perception of brightness and darkness: Relations to neuronal receptive fields”, in Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations Eds SpillmannLWernerJ S, (San Diego, CA: Academic Press).
10.
FoleyJ MMcCourtM E, 1985“Visual grating induction”Journal of the Optical Society of America A21220–1230.
11.
GilchristA L, 1977“Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement”Science195185–187.
12.
GilchristA L, 1980“When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?”Perception & Psychophysics28527–538.
13.
GilchristA L, 1983“Lightness constancy through a veiling luminance”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9936–944.
14.
GilchristA L, 1988“Lightness contrast and failure of lightness constancy: A common explanation”Perception & Psychophysics43415–424.
15.
JamesW, 1890/1981The Principles of Psychology (New York: Dover).
16.
KingdomF A AMcCourtM EBlakesleeB, 1997“In defense of ‘lateral inhibition’ as the underlying cause of induced brightness effects. A reply to Spehar, Gilchrist and Arend”Vision Research371039–1044.
17.
KingdomF A AMouldenB, 1988“Border effects on brightness: A review of findings, models and issues”Spatial Vision3225–262.
18.
KingdomF A AMouldenB, 1992“A multi-channel approach to brightness coding”Vision Research321565–1582.
KnillD CKerstenDMamassianP, 1996“Implications of a Bayesian formulation of visual information processing for psychophysics”, in Perception as Bayesian Inference Eds KnillD CRichardsW, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21.
McCourtM E, 1982“A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect”Vision Research22119–134.
22.
McCourtM EBlakesleeB, 1993“The effect of edge blur on grating induction magnitude”Vision Research332499–2508.
23.
MouldenBKingdomF, 1991“The local border mechanism in grating induction”Vision Research311999–2008.
24.
SchirilloJArendL, 1995“Illumination change at a depth edge can reduce lightness constancy”Perception & Psychophysics57225–230.
25.
SchirilloJReevesAArendL, 1990“Perceived lightness, but not brightness, of achromatic surfaces depends on perceived depth information”Perception & Psychophysics4882–90.
26.
SchirilloJ AShevellS K, 1993“Lightness and brightness judgments of coplanar retinally non-contiguous surfaces”Journal of the Optical Society of America A102442–2452.
27.
SpeharBGilchristAArendL, 1995“The critical role of relative luminance relations in White's effect and grating induction”Vision Research352603–2614.
28.
WishartK AFrisbyJ PBuckleyD, 1997“The role of 3-D surface slope in a lightness/brightness effect”Vision Research37467–473.
29.
WhittleP, 1986“Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination”Vision Research261677–1691.
30.
WhittleP, 1992“Brightness, discriminability and the crispening effect”Vision Research321493–1507.
31.
WhittleP, 1994“Contrast brightness and ordinary seeing”, in Lightness, Brightness, and Transparency Ed. GilchristA, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 111–157.
