The effect of attention of the perceived length of briefly presented peripheral lines was investigated. Attention was manipulated by engaging observers in a second concurrent task (letter identification). Observers used the method of adjustment to indicate the length of the stimulus lines. In two experiments it was found that the primary effect of attention was to reduce the variability of line length adjustments. Previously investigators had reported that attention reduces perceived line length. A third experiment suggested that these previously reported results might have been the outcome of a spatial interaction with the cue used to manipulate attention, but not the result of visual attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonnelA-MPossamaïC-ASchmittM, 1987“Early modulation of visual input: A study in attentional strategies”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A39757–776
2.
ColbyC L, 1991“The neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of attention”Journal of Child Neurology6S90–S118
3.
ConnorC EPreddieD CGallantJ LVan EssenD C (in press) “Spatial attention effects in Macaque area V4”Journal of Neuroscience
4.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1972“Differential and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics12466–470
5.
CorenSPoracC, 1983“The creation and reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion through attentional manipulation”Perception1249–54
6.
EriksenC WSpencerT, 1969“Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations”Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph79 (number 2, part 2) 1–16
7.
GardnerR WLongR I, 1961“Selective attention and the Müller-Lyer illusion”The Psychological Record1961317–320
8.
HatfieldG, 1996“Attention in early scientific psychology”, in Visual Attention Ed. WrightR D (New York: Oxford University Press)
9.
HoffmanJ E, 1978“Search through a sequentially presented visual display”Perception & Psychophysics231–11
10.
HoffmanJ E, 1979“A two-stage model of visual search”Perception & Psychophysics25319–327
11.
JamesW, 1890The Principles of Psychology (New York: Henry Holt)
12.
JonidesJ, 1980“Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement”Canadian Journal of Psychology34103–112
13.
KeppelG, 1991Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall)
14.
KunnapasT M, 1955“Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line”Journal of Experimental Psychology50168–170
15.
LuceR D, 1977“Thurstone's discriminal processes fifty years later”Psychometrika42461–489
16.
LuckS JHillyardS AMoulouaMHawkinsH L, 1996“Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27725–737
17.
MaddoxW TAshbyF G (in press) “Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: Comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996)”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
18.
PosnerM I, 1980“Orienting of attention”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology323–25
19.
PrinzmetalWAmiriHAllenKEdwardsT (in press) “The phenomenology of attention. Part 1: Color, location, orientation, and ‘clarity’”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
20.
PrinzmetalWBanksW P, 1983“Perceptual capacity limits in visual detection and search”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society4263–266
21.
PrinzmetalWGettlemanL, 1993“Vertical – horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two”Perception & Psychophysics5381–88
22.
PrinzmetalWKeysarB, 1989“A functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118165–190
23.
PrinzmetalWNwachukuIBodanskiLBlumenfeldLShimizuN (in preparation) “The phenomenology of attention, Part 2: brightness and contrast”
24.
SchianoDTverskyB, 1992“Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs”Memory & Cognition2012–20
25.
ShiuLPashlerH, 1994“Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance201037–1054
26.
ShulmanG L, 1992“Attentional modulation of size contrast”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A45529–546
27.
SwetsJ AShipleyE FMcKeyM JGreenD M, 1964“Multiple observations of signals in noise”, in Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers Ed. SwetsJ A (New York: John Wiley) pp 201–220
28.
TitchenerE B, 1908Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention (New York: MacMillan)
29.
TitchenerE B, 1910A Text-book of Psychology (New York: Macmillan)
30.
TsalY, 1984“A Müller-Lyer illusion induced by selective attention”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A36319–333
31.
TsalYShalevL, 1996“Inattention magnifies perceived length: The attentional receptive field hypothesis”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22233–243
32.
TsalYShalevLZakayDLubowR E, 1994“Attention reduces perceived brightness contrast”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A47865–893
33.
WoodworthR S, 1938Experimental Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co)
