Ptolemy's Optics which was written in about the year 150 ad contains an account of the geometry of binocular vision which has been almost totally neglected in the vision literature. An English translation of the relevant passages from the Latin text in Lejeune (1956) is presented together with commentaries and a brief introduction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguiloniusF, 1613Opticorum Libri Sex (Antwerp: Plantin)
2.
BurtonH E, 1945“The Optics of Euclid”Journal of the Optical Society of America35357–372
3.
CohenM RDrabkinI E, 1958A Source Book in Greek Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
4.
CrombieA C, 1967“The mechanistic hypothesis and the scientific study of vision: Some optical ideas as a background to the invention of the microscope”, in Historical Aspects of Microscopy Eds BradburySTurnerG L'E, (Cambridge: Heffer) pp 3–112
5.
DelambreJ B, 1812“Die Optik des Ptolemäus, verglichen mit der Euclid's, Alhazen's und Vitellio's”Annalen der Physik40371–388. An English translation prepared by Antonie Howard is available on request
6.
GoviG, 1885L'Ottica di Claudio Tolomeo (Turin)
7.
HeringE, 1865“Die Gesetze der binocularen Tiefenwahrnehmung”Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin152–165
8.
HirschbergJ, 1899“Geschichte der Augenheilkunde” in Graefe-Saemisch Handbuch der gesamten Augenheilkundevolume 12 (Leipzig: Engelmann)
9.
HowardI P, 1996“Alhazen's neglected discoveries of visual phenomena”Perception251203–1217
10.
HowardI PRogersB J, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (New York: Oxford University Press)
11.
LejeuneA, (Ed.), 1956L'Optique de Claude Ptolémée. The Latin version translated from the Arabic by the Emir Eugène of Sicily (Louvain: University of Louvain)
12.
LejeuneA, (Ed. and Transl.), 1989L'Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d'après l'arabe de l'émir Eugène de Sicile (Leiden: Brill)
13.
LindbergD C, 1976Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
14.
MachE, 1926The Principles of Physical Optics. An Historical and Philosophical Treatment Transl. AndersonJ SYoungA F A, (London: Methuen)
15.
MayM T, 1968Galen. On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
16.
OnoH, 1981“On Well's (1792) law of visual direction”Perception & Psychophysics30403–406
17.
PrévostP, 1804Essais de Philosophie ou étude de l'esprit Humain (Geneva: Paschoud)
18.
SabraA I, 1966“Ibn al-Haytham's criticisms of Ptolemy's Optics”Journal of the History of Philosophy4145–149
19.
SiegelR E, 1970Galen on Sense Perception (Basel: Karger)
20.
ViethG A U, 1818“Über die Richtung der Augen”Annalen der Physik28233–253
21.
WadeN J, 1987“On the late invention of the stereoscope”Perception16785–818
22.
WadeN J, 1996“Descriptions of visual phenomena from Aristotle to Wheatstone”Perception251137–1175
23.
WellsW C, 1792An Essay upon Single Vision with Two Eyes: Together with Experiments and Observations on Several Other Subjects in Optics (London: T Cadell)
24.
WheatstoneC, 1838“Contributions to the physiology of vision—Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128371–394
