After prolonged viewing of a three-element target in which the middle element is spatially offset, subsequent viewing of the same three elements in alignment results in the middle element appearing to be offset in the opposite direction. This adaptational aftereffect to a spatial offset was investigated with elements which were spatial-frequency narrowband and equidetectable to ascertain (a) the properties of the mechanisms involved and (b) the nature of the underlying computation. Evidence is presented in favour of an orientational-grouping, rather than a purely positional computation, underlying this aftereffect. A dual site of adaptation is proposed: one which receives input from the orientation extracted from the output of linear filters, and another which receives input from the orientation derived from grouping processes working on the contrast-energy representation. These may correspond to the mechanisms which are thought to underlie the processing of real and subjective contours.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsD P, 1967“Error-correcting perceptual systems”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology16104–115
2.
BarlowH B, 1990“A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual aftereffects”, in Vision Coding and Efficiency Ed. BlakemoreC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
3.
BurtonG JNagshinehSRuddockK H, 1977“Processing by the human visual system of light and dark contrast components of the retinal image”Biological Cybernetics27(4) 189–197
4.
CarpenterR H SBlakemoreC, 1973“Interactions between orientations in human vision”Experimental Brain Research18287–303
5.
DeValoisK K, 1977“Independence of black and white: Phase-specific adaptation”Vision Research17209–215
6.
FieldD JHayesAHessR F, 1993“Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field””Vision Research33173–193
7.
GeorgesonM A, 1973“Spatial frequency selectivity of a visual tilt illusion”Nature (London)24543–45
8.
GibsonJ J, 1933“Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines”Journal of Experimental Psychology161–31
9.
GibsonJ JRadnerM, 1937“Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies”Journal of Experimental Psychology20453–467
10.
GrahamN S, 1989“Visual pattern analysers”Oxford Psychology Series No. 16 (New York: Oxford University Press)
11.
GreeneEFiserJ, 1994“Classical geometric illusions effects with non classical stimuli: Angular induction from decomposing lines into point arrays”Perception & Psychophysics56575–589
12.
GreenleeM WMagnussenS, 1987“Saturation of the tilt aftereffect”Vision Research271041–1043
13.
HessR FBadcockD B, 1995“The metric for separation discrimination by the human visual system”Journal of the Optical Society of America (in press)
14.
HessR FHayesA, 1994“The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: effects of spatial scale and eccentricity”Vision Research34625–643
15.
HessR FHollidayI, 1992“The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: effects of spatial scale and contrast”Vision Research321085–1097
16.
von der HeydtRPeterhansEBaumgartnerG, 1984“Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses”Science2241260–1262
17.
KohlerWWallachH, 1944“Figural after-effects: an investigation of visual processes”Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society88269–357
18.
LeviD MKleinS A, 1992“‘Weber's Law’ for position: the role of spatial frequency and contrast”Vision Research322235–2250
19.
MagnussenSKurtenbachW, 1979“A test for contrast-polarity selectivity in the tilt aftereffect”Perception8523–528
ParkerD M, 1972“Contrast and size variables and the tilt after-effect”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology241–7
22.
PeterhansEvon der HeydtRBaumgartnerG, 1986“Neural responses to illusory contour stimuli reveals stages of visual processing”, in Visual Neuroscience Eds PettigrewJ DSandersonK JLevickW R (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
23.
SmithA TOverR, 1975“Tilt after-effects with subjective contours”Nature (London)257581–582
24.
StromeyerC FIIIDawsonB M, 1978“Form color aftereffects: selectivity to local luminance contrast”Perception7407–415
25.
SuzukiSCavanaghP, 1994“Focussed attention distorts visual space”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science35(4) p 2081
26.
ToetA, 1987Perception of Spatial OrderPhD thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
27.
WareCMitchellD E, 1974“The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect”Vision Research14735–737
28.
WattR JMorganM J, 1985“A theory of the primative spatial code in human vision”Vision Research251661–1674
29.
WilsonH R, 1986“Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity”Vision Research26453–469
30.
WolfeG M, 1984“Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects”Vision Research241959–1964
31.
WolfeG M, 1987“The vernier aftereffect”Perception16593–597
32.
YehS-LDeValoisK KDeValoisR L, 1992“Figural after effects with isoluminant blobs”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science33(4), (supplement) 704 (abstract)
33.
YehS-LDeValoisR LDeValoisK KChenI-P, 1991“Adaptation to spatial position”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science32(4) (supplement) p1268 (abstract)
