A single stimulus determined the alternative perceptions of an illusory transparent grey disk or of an internally illuminated circular hole. A square on a far background was visible through this disk or hole. Subjects rated the grey colour of the transparent disk or the phenomenal illumination inside the hole. The luminance difference relative to the transparent disk and the square and that relative to this disk and its background determined the probability of perceiving the transparent disk or the hole. Rated colour and illumination substantially depended only on this second difference. These results have implications for models of phenomenal transparency and illumination based on the idea that proximal contours activate neural representations of phenomenal attributes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonN H, 1981Foundations of Information Integration Theory (New York: Academic Press)
2.
ArendL E, 1973“Spatial differential and integral operations in human vision: Implications of stabilized retinal image fading”Psychological Review80374–395
3.
ArendL EBuehlerJ NLockheadG R, 1971“Difference information in brightness perception”Perception & Psychophysics9367–370
4.
BeckJ, 1959“Stimulus correlates for the judged illumination of a surface”Journal of Experimental Psychology58267–274
5.
BeckJ, 1961“Judgments of surface illumination and lightness”Journal of Experimental Psychology61368–375
6.
BourdonB, 1936“Sur un expérience de transparence”Journal de Psychologie33712–716
7.
CappellazzoD, 1990“Sondaggio preliminare: ruolo della distanza e dei conseguenti effetto filtro e finestra sulla percezione del grado di trasparenza”Doctoral dissertation, Department of Education Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
8.
FromherzS D, 1994“A psychological model for the perception of transparency”Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Oregon, USA
9.
FuchsW, 1923“Experimentelle Untersuchungen über das simultane Hintereinandersehen auf derselben Sehrichtung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie91145–235
10.
GilchristA L, 1977“Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement”Science195185–187
11.
GilchristA L, 1979“The perception of surface blacks and whites”Scientific American240(3) 88–97
12.
GilchristA L, 1980“When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?”Perception & Psychophysics28527–538
13.
GilchristA LDelmanSJacobsenA, 1983“The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination”Perception & Psychophysics33425–436
14.
GilchristA LJacobsenA, 1984“Perception of lightness and illumination in a world of one reflectance”Perception135–19
15.
GirgusJRockIEgatzR, 1977“The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures”Perception & Psychophysics22550–556
16.
KatzD, 1935The World of Colour (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner)
17.
KerenG, 1993“A balanced approach to unbalanced designs”, in A Handbook for Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences: Statistical Issues Eds KerenGLewisC (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) pp 95–127
18.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World)
19.
KozakiA, 1965“The effect of co-existing stimuli other than test stimulus on brightness constancy”Japanese Psychological Research7138–147
20.
KozakiA, 1973“Perception of lightness and brightness of achromatic surface color and impression of illumination”Japanese Psychological Research15194–203
21.
KozakiA, 1991“Perception of lightness and spatial organisation”, in Studies of Perceptual Organisation and Systems of Reference Ed. KozakiT (Tokyo: Keio University) pp 83–92 (in Japanese)
22.
KozakiANoguchiK, 1976“The relationship between perceived surface-lightness and perceived illumination”Psychological Research391–16
23.
KozakiT, 1974“The role of background lightness in the apparent transparency” Report No 7, Psychological Laboratory, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan
24.
KrauskopfJ, 1963“Effect of retinal image stabilization on the appearance of heterochromatic targets”Journal of the Optical Society of America53741–744
25.
KrauskopfJ, 1967“Heterochromatic stabilized images: A classroom demonstration”American Journal of Psychology80634–637
26.
LockheadG R, 1992“Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects?”Behavioral and Brain Sciences15543–558
27.
LogvinenkoAMenshikovaG, 1994“Trade-off between achromatic colour and perceived illumination as revealed by the use of pseudoscopic inversion of apparent depth”Perception231007–1023
28.
MachE, 1959The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical (New York: Dover) (Translated by WilliamsC W from the 1st German edition, 1885. Revised and supplemented by WaterlowS from the 5th German edition, 1906)
29.
MasinS C, 1984“An experimental comparison of three versus four-surface phenomenal transparency”Perception & Psychophysics35325–332
30.
MasinS C, 1991“A weighted-average model of achromatic transparency”Perception & Psychophysics49563–571
31.
MasinS C, 1992“Psychophysics and quantitative perceptual laws”Behavioral and Brain Sciences15575–576
32.
MasinS CIdoneA M, 1981“Studio sperimentale sulla percezione della trasparenza con figura e sfondo acromatici e omogenei”Giornale Italiano di Psicologia8265–277
33.
MasinS CKozakiA, in press “A study of perceived illumination”Paper read at a meeting in honour of A Lucca, October 27–28, 1994, Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua
34.
MetelliF, 1975“Shadows without penumbra”, in Gestalttheorie in der Modernen Psychologie Eds ErtelSKemmlerLStadlerL (Darmstadt: Steinkopff) pp 200–209
35.
MetelliF, 1976“What does ‘more transparent’ mean? A paradox”, in Vision and Artifact Ed. HenleM (New York: Springer) pp 19–24
36.
MetzgerW, 1975Gesetze des Sehens (Frankfurt am Main: Kramer)
37.
MilliganG WWongD SThompsonP A, 1987“Robustness properties of nonorthogonal analysis of variance”Psychological Bulletin101464–470
38.
NakayamaKShimojoSRamachandranV S, 1990“Transparency: relation to depth, subjective contours, luminance, and neon color spreading”Perception19497–513
39.
OyamaT, 1968“Stimulus determinants of brightness constancy and the perception of illumination”Japanese Psychological Research10146–155
40.
RockIMitchenerK, 1992“Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects”Perception2139–45
41.
TrueswellJ CHayhoeM M, 1993“Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception”Vision Research33313–328
42.
Tudor-HartB, 1928“New studies in transparency, form, and colour”Psychologische Forschung10255–298
