A general framework is considered for how different features of image parts determine the perceived direction of apparent motion between these parts as a function of their internalized feature weights. It is shown how the compatibility and constraints between pairwise part correspondences also play important roles in the types of perceived motion between parts; this process is modelled via a multivariate constraint-satisfaction procedure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BraddickO J, 1980“Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B290137–151
2.
BurrD CRossJ HMorroneM C, 1986“Smooth and sampled motion”Vision Research26643–652
3.
CaelliTDodwellP, 1980“On the contours of apparent motion: A new perspective on visual space—time”Biological Cybernetics3927–35
CavanaghPMatherG, 1989“Motion: The long and short of it”Spatial Vision4103–129
6.
FinlayD CManningM L, 1991“Electrophysiological examination of some apparent motion effects” in Channels in the Visual Nervous System: Neurophysiology, Psychophysics and Models Ed. BlumB (London: Freund)
7.
FosterD, 1975“Visual apparent motion and some preferred paths in the rotation group SO(3)”Biological Cybernetics1881–89
8.
GeorgesonM AHarrisM G, 1990“The temporal range of motion sensation and motion perception”Vision Research30615–619
9.
GreenM, 1986“What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion”Vision Research26599–607
10.
KolersP, 1972Aspects of Motion Perception (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
11.
KolersPGreenM, 1984“Color logic of apparent motion”Perception13249–254
12.
KolersPvon GrunauM, 1976“Shape and colour in apparent motion”Vision Research16329–335
13.
KorteA, 1915“Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie72193–206
14.
PrazdnyK, 1986“What variables control (long-range) apparent motion?”Perception1537–40
15.
ReichardtW, 1961“Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system” in Principles of Sensory Communication Ed. RosenblithW A (New York: John Wiley) pp 303–317
16.
RosenfeldAKakA, 1982Digital Picture Processing (New York: Academic Press)
17.
SchechterSHochsteinSHillmanP, 1988“Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues”Vision Research281013–1021
18.
UllmanS, 1979The Interpretation of Visual Motion (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
19.
WatsonA B, 1986“Apparent motion occurs only between similar spatial frequencies”Vision Research261727–1730
