When the motion of an object is influenced by gravity (eg free fall, pendulum, wave motion), that influence may provide a cue to computing the absolute distance and/or size of the object. Formal analysis supports the claim that the distance and size of moving objects are generally computable with reference to the gravitational component of motion. Informal evidence from judgments of realism in films is consistent with this gravity-cue hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerkeleyG, 1709“A new theory of vision” in Berkeley's Philosphical Writings Ed. ArmstrongD M (1965) (New York: Collier Books)
2.
ChapmanS, 1968“Catching a baseball”American Journal of Physics36868–870
3.
CrowellJ ABanksM SRoydenC S, 1989, “A physiologically plausible model of optic flow perception”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science30427
4.
CulhaneJ, 1981Special Effects in the Movies: How They Do It (New York: Ballantine Books)
5.
GibsonJ JOlumPRosenblattF, 1955“Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings”American Journal of Psychology68372–385
6.
GottsdankerR MFrickJ WLockardR B, 1961“Identifying the acceleration of visual targets”British Journal of Psychology5231–42
7.
Von HofstenC, 1990“Catching” in Tutorials on Perception and Actions Eds HeuerHSandersA F (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum)
8.
IttelsonW H, 1951“Size as a cue to distance: Static localization”American Journal of Psychology5354–67
9.
JohanssonGJanssonG, 1967“The perception of free fall”, Seminar delivered at the University of Uppsala (unpublished)
10.
LeeD N, 1974“Visual information during locomotion”, in Perception: Essays in Honor of James J Gibson Eds McLeodR BPickH L (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
11.
LieI, 1965“Convergence as a cue to perceived size and distance”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology6109–116
12.
Longuet-HigginsH CPrazdnyK, 1980“The interpretation of a moving retinal image”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B208385–397
13.
RogersBGrahamM, 1982“Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception”Vision Research22261–270
14.
SaxbergB V H, 1987a“Projected free fall trajectories: I. Theory and simulation”Biological Cybernetics56159–175
15.
SaxbergB V H, 1987b“Projected free fall trajectories: II. Human experiments”Biological Cybernetics56177–184
16.
SchmerlerJ, 1976“The visual perception of accelerated motion”Perception5167–185
17.
SpottiswoodeR, 1969The Focal Encyclopedia of Film and Television Techniques (New York: Hastings House)
18.
ToddJ T, 1981“Visual information about moving objects”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7795–810
19.
WoodworthR SSchlosbergH, 1954Experimental Psychology (New York: Holt)
20.
WitkinH ADykR BPattersonH FGoodenoughD RKarpS A, 1962Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development (New York: John Wiley)
21.
YonasAPettersenLGranrudC E, 1982“Infants' sensitivity to familiar size as information for distance”Child Development531285–1290
