Distance disparity is a strong cue to element correspondence in apparent motion. Using a 2-AFC paradigm we have previously shown that shape similarity also plays a role. We now demonstrate a small gender difference in these effects: women are more sensitive to distance disparity, whereas men are more sensitive to differences in shape. Furthermore, in the competing presence of a shape cue, women's sensitivity to distance decreases while men's sensitivity is unaffected. These observations may be related to putative gender differences in the ‘form’ and ‘motion—spatial relations’ cortical pathways.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BloughP MSlavinK, 1987“Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual—spatial performance”Perception & Psychophysics41276–281
2.
BraddickO J, 1974“A short range process in apparent motion”Vision Research14519–527
3.
BraddickO J, 1980“Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B290137–151
4.
BursteinBBankLJarvikL, 1980“Sex differences in cognitive functioning: Evidence, determinant, implications”Human Development23289–313
5.
ChangJ JJuleszB, 1983“Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion”Vision Research231379–1385
6.
De YoeE AVan EssenD C, 1988“Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex”Trends in Neuroscience11219–226
7.
HarrisL, 1978“Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors” in Asymmetrical Function of the Brain Ed. KinsbourneM (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 405–521
8.
HuttC, 1972Males and Females (Middlesex: Penguin Books)
9.
KailRCarterPPellegrinoJ, 1979“The locus of sex differences in spatial ability”Perception & Psychophysics26182–186
10.
KolersP A, 1972Aspects of Motion Perception (New York: Pergamon Press)
11.
LivingstoneM SHubelD H, 1987“Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, movement, and depth”Journal of Neuroscience73416–3468
12.
MaccobyEJacklinC, 1974The Psychology of Sex Differences (Stanford: Stanford University Press)
13.
McGeeM, 1979“Human spatial abilities, psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences”Psychological Bulletin86889–918
14.
McGloneJ, 1980“Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey”Behavioral and Brain Sciences3215–263
15.
MilkmanNSchickGRossettoMRatliffFShapleyRVictorJ, 1980“A two dimensional computer-controlled visual stimulator”Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation12283–292
16.
MishkinMUngerleiderL GMackoK O, 1983“Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways”Trends in Neuroscience6414–417
17.
ShapleyRRossettoM, 1976“An electronic visual stimulator”Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation815–20
18.
ShechterSHochsteinSHillmanP, 1988“Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues”Vision Research281013–1021
19.
ShepardRMetzlerJ, 1971“Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects”Science171701–703
20.
ShermanJ, 1978Sex-related Cognitive Differences: An Essay on Theory and Evidence (Springfield, IL: Thomas)
21.
TapleySBrydenM, 1977“An investigation of sex differences in spatial ability: Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects”Canadian Journal of Psychology31123–130
22.
UllmanS, 1979The Interpretation of Visual Motion (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
23.
Van EssenDMaunsellJ H R, 1983“Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex”Trends in Neuroscience6370–375
24.
WertheimerM, 1912“Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie601–11
