Moving phantom visibility was measured in two experiments where the global figure-ground and depth relations within phantom-inducing patterns were manipulated. The local inducing environment where the illusion occurred was identical for all patterns. Phantom visibility was significantly reduced when occlusion cues specified the phantom-inducing parts of a pattern as ground. These results suggest conflicting figure – ground and depth information interferes with the representation and perception of phantoms as figure regions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronJ, 1981“The word superiority effect” in Handbook of Learning and Cognitive ProcessesVolume 6 Ed. EstesW K (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 317–364
2.
BeckJ, 1965“Apparent spatial position and the perception of lightness”Journal of Experimental Psychology69170–179
3.
BiedermanI, 1981“On the semantics of a glance at a scene” in Perceptual Organization Eds KubovyMPomerantzJ (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 279–343
4.
BradleyD, 1987“Cognitive contours and perceptual organization” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 201–212
5.
BrownJ M, 1985Phantom contour completion: A figure/ground approachunpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
6.
BrownJ MWeissteinN, 1985“Flickering phantoms: A figure/ground approach”Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association5638 (Abstract)
BrownJ MWeissteinN, 1988b“A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth”Perception & Psychophysics44157–166
9.
ChapanisAMcClearyR A, 1953“Interposition as a cue for the perception of relative distance”Journal of General Psychology48113–132
10.
GilchristA L, 1977“Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial location”Science195185–187
11.
GilchristA L, 1979“The perception of surface blacks and whites”Scientific American240112–124
12.
GilchristA L, 1980“When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?”Perception & Psychophysics28527–538
13.
GilchristA LDelmanSJacobsenA, 1983“The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination”Perception & Psychophysics33425–436
14.
GrossbergS, 1987“Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color and brightness perception: I. Monocular theory”Perception & Psychophysics4187–116
15.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985“Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color”Psychological Review92173–211
16.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger)
17.
KellmanP JShipleyT F, 1987“Interpolation processes in visual object perception: Evidence for a discontinuity theory”paper presented at the 28th meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Seattle
18.
KellmanP JShipleyT F, 1991“A theory of visual interpolation in object perception”Cognitive Psychology23141–221
19.
KlymenkoVWeissteinN, 1986“Spatial frequency differences can determine figure – ground organization”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance12324–330
20.
KlymenkoVWeissteinN, 1989a“Figure and ground in space and time: 1. Temporal response surfaces of perceptual organization”Perception18627–637
21.
KlymenkoVWeissteinN, 1989b“Figure and ground in space and time: 2. Frequency, velocity, and perceptual organization”Perception18639–648
22.
KlymenkoVWeissteinNTopolskiRHsiehC, 1989“Spatial and temporal frequency in figure– ground organization”Perception & Psychophysics45395–403
23.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World)
24.
McCourtM E, 1982“A spatial frequency dependent grating induction effect”Vision Research22119–134
25.
MaguireWBlattbergK, 1986“Effects of contrast of occluder and flicker frequency on displays which produce phantom contours”Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association5762
26.
MaguireWBrownJ M, 1987“Current state of research into visual phantoms” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 213–219
27.
MulvannyPMacarthurRSekulerR, 1982“Thresholds for seeing visual phantoms and moving gratings”Perception1135–46
28.
NakayamaKShimojoSSilvermanG H, 1989“Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects”Perception1855–68
29.
RubinE, 1921/1958“Figure and ground” [Visual wahrgenommene Figuren (1921, Glydendalkse)], reprinted in Readings in Perception Eds BeardsleeD CWertheimerM (1958, Princeton NJ: Van Nor strand) pp 194–203
30.
ShimojoSSilvermanG HNakayamaK, 1989“Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion”Vision Research29(5)619–626
31.
ShipleyT FKellmanP J, 1990“Perception of partly occluded objects and subjective figures: Evidence for a common process”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science31 10$ (Abstract)
32.
TynanPSekulerR, 1975“Moving visual phantoms: A new contour completion effect”Science188951–952
33.
WeissteinNHarrisC, 1974“Visual detection of line segments: An object superiority effect”Science186752–755
34.
WongEWeissteinN, 1982“A new perceptual context-superiority effect: Line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground”Science218587–589
35.
WongEWeissteinN, 1983“Sharp targets are detected better against figure, and blurred targets are detected better against ground”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9194–202
36.
WongEWeissteinN, 1984“Flicker induces depth: Spatial and temporal factors in the perceptual segregation of flickering and nonflickering regions in depth”Perception & Psychophysics35229–236
37.
WongEWeissteinN, 1985“A new visual illusion: Flickering fields are localized in a depth plane behind nonflickering fields”Perception1413–17
38.
WongEWeissteinN, 1987“The effects of flicker on the perception of figure and ground”Perception & Psychophysics41440–448
