Noting the similarity between the illusion decrement and selective adaptation paradigms, Long has challenged the view that illusion decrement effects reflect a strategic—as opposed to a structural—underlying mechanism, and has called for further research on this issue. To investigate the confound between prolonged free inspection and repeated trials in the standard decrement procedure, the effects of three inspection conditions (continuous, intermittent, and immediate) on the magnitude of the overestimation Mueller-Lyer illusion have been assessed under two levels of trials (a total of two or six judgments). Significant illusion decline was found only under conditions of repeated trials, with either continuous or intermittent inspection. These findings do not support the predictions of purely structural theories (including neural adaptation and efferent readiness theories), according to which degree of decrement should be determined solely by viewing time. Instead, the data demonstrate that illusion decrement is a product of practice, providing converging evidence for the view of decrement as involving a cognitive ‘recalibration’ or learning process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ R, 1986Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence, Erljbaum Associates)
2.
BenussiV, 1904“Zur Psychologie des Gestalterfassens (die Müller-Lyersche Figur” in, Untersuchungen zur Gegenstands Theorie und Psychologie Ed. MeinongA (Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Burth)
3.
BinetA, 1895“La mesure des illusions visuelles chez les adults et chez les enfants”Revue Philosophique4011–25
4.
BurnhamC A, 1968“Decrement of the Mueller-Lyer illusion with saccadic and tracking eye movements”Perception & Psychophysics3424–426
5.
ColtheartM, 1971“Visual feature-analyzers and aftereffects of tilt and curvature”Psychological Review78114–121
6.
CorenS, 1981“The interaction between eye movements and visual illusions” in Eye Movements: Cognition and Human Perception Eds FisherD FMontyR ASendersJ W (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
7.
CorenSFestingerL, 1967“An alternative view of the Gibson normalization effect”, Perception & Psychophysics2621–626
8.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1972“Differentiation and decrement in the Mueller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics 12 466–470
9.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1973“Visual spatial illusions: Many explanations”Science1795034
10.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1974“Transfer of illusion decrement as a function of perceived similarity”Journal of Experimental Psychology102881–887
11.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1978Seeing Is Deceiving: The Psychology of Visual Illusions (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
12.
CorenSGirgusJ SSchianoD J, 1986“Is adaptation of orientation-specific cortical cells a plausible explanation of illusion decrement?”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society24(3) 207–210
13.
CorenSHoenigP, 1972“Eye movements and decrement in the Oppel-Kundt illusion”Perception & Psychophysics12224–225
14.
CorenSPoracC, 1984“Structural and cognitive components in the Mueller-Lyer illusion assessed via cyclopean presentation”Perception & Psychophysics35313–318
15.
CorenSWardL M, 1979“Levels of processing in visual illusions: The combination and interaction of distortion-producing mechanisms”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5324–335
16.
DayR H, 1962“The effects of repeated trials and prolonged fixation on error in the Mueller-Lyer figure”Psychological Monographs67 (whole no. 533)
17.
DelabarreE B, 1897“A method of recording eye movements”American Journal of Psychology9572–574
18.
DewarR E, 1967“The effect of angle between the oblique lines on the decrement of the Mueller-Lyer illusion with extended practice”Perception & Psychophysics2426–428
19.
DewarR E, 1968“Distribution of practice and the Mueller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics3246–248
20.
ErlebacherASekularR, 1969“Explanation of the Mueller-Lyer illusion: Confusion theory examined”Journal of Experimental Psychology80462–467
21.
EvansC RMarsdenR P, 1966“A study of the effect of perfect retinal stabilization on some well-known visual illusions, using the after-image as a method for compensating for eye movements”British Journal of Physiological Optics23242–248
22.
EysenckHSlaterP, 1958“Effects of practice and rest on fluctuations in the Mueller-Lyer illusion”British Journal of Psychology49246–256
23.
FestingerLBurnhamC AOnoHBamberD, 1967“Efference and the conscious experience of perception”Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph (whole no. 637)
24.
FestingerLWhiteC WAllynM R, 1968“Eye movements and decrement in the Mueller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics3376–382
25.
FindlayJ MHotopfW H N, 1985“Eye movements and illusions of alignment”Perception & Psychophysics14387–391
26.
FrisbyJ P, 1980Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
27.
GirgusJ SCorenS, 1982“Assimilation and contrast distortions: Differences in plasticity”Perception & Psychophysics32555–561
28.
GirgusJ SCorenSDurantMPoracC, 1975“The assessment of components involved in illusion formation using a long-term decrement procedure”Perception & Psychophysics18144–148
29.
GirgusJ SCorenSHorowitzL, 1973“Peripheral and central components in variants of the Mueller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics13157–160
30.
HelsonH, 1964Adaptation-level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior (New York: Harper)
31.
HeymansG, 1896“Quantitative Untersuchungen über das optische Paradoxen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie9221–255
32.
HicksG DRiversW H R, 1908“The illusion of compared horizontal and vertical lines”British Journal of Psychology2243–260
33.
HoenigP, 1972The Effects of Eye Movements, Fixation and Figure Size on Decrement in the Mueller-Lyer Illusionunpublished doctoral dissertation, The New School for Social Research, New York
34.
JuddC H, 1902“Practice and its effect on the perception of illusions”Psychological Review827–39
KlingJ WRiggsL A, 1972Woodworth and Schlosberg's Experimental Psychology3rd edition (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston)
37.
KoehlerWFishbackJ, 1950a“The destruction of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: I. An examination of two theories”Journal of Experimental Psychology40267–281
38.
KoehlerWFishbackJ, 1950b“The destruction of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: II. Satiation patterns and memory trace”Journal of Experimental Psychology40938–941
39.
LaddG TWoodworthR S, 1911Elements of Physiological Psychology (New York: Scribner's)
40.
LewisE O, 1908“The effect of practice on the perception of the Mueller-Lyer illusion”British Journal of Psychology2294–306
41.
LongG M, 1988“Selective adaptation vs transfer of decrement: The conjoint effects of neural fatigue and perceptual learning”Perception & Psychophysics43207–209
42.
LongG MToppinoT C, 1981“Multiple representations of the same reversible figure: Implications for cognitive decisional interpretations”Perception10231–234
43.
LongG MToppinoT CKostenbauderJ F, 1983“As the cube turns: Evidence for two processes in the perception of a dynamic reversible figure”Perception & Psychophysics3429–38
44.
MountjoyP T, 1958“Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Mueller-Lyer illusion”Journal of Experimental Psychology5697–102
45.
MountjoyP T, 1960“Fixation and decrement to the Mueller-Lyer illusion”Psychological Record10219–223
46.
MountjoyP T, 1961“Intrasession decrement and intersession recovery to the Mueller-Lyer figure”Perceptual and Motor Skills1351–57
47.
MountjoyP T, 1963“Mueller-Lyer decrement as a function of number of adjustment trials and configurations of the illusion figure”Psychological Record13471–481
48.
ParkerN INewbiggingP L, 1963“Magnitude and decrement of the Mueller-Lyer illusion as a function of pre-training”Canadian Journal of Psychology17134–140
49.
PollackR HChaplinM R, 1964“Effects of prolonged stimulation by components of the Mueller-Lyer figure upon the magnitude of the illusion”Perceptual and Motor Skills18377–382
50.
PoracC, 1989“Is visual illusion decrement based on selective adaptation?”Perception & Psychophysics46279–283
51.
PoracCCorenS, 1977“The assessment of motor control in sighting dominance using an illusion decrement procedure”Perception & Psychophysics21341–346
52.
PoracCCorenS, 1985“Transfer of illusion decrement: The effects of global versus local figural variations”Perception & Psychophysics37515–522
PresseyA W, 1971“An extension of assimilation theory to illusions of size, area and direction”Perception & Psychophysics9172–176
55.
PritchardR M, 1958“Visual illusions viewed as stabilized retinal images”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology1077–81
56.
ReganD, 1982“Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision”Psychological Review89407–444
57.
RestleFDeckerJ, 1977“Size of the Mueller-Lyer illusion as a function of its dimensions: Theory and data”Perception & Psychophysics21489–503
58.
RestleFMerrymanC T, 1968“An adaptation-level theory account of a relative-size illusion”Psychonomic Science12229–230
59.
RudelR GTeuberH L, 1963“Decrement of visual and haptic Mueller-Lyer illusion on repeated trials: A study of cross-modal transfer”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology15125–131
60.
SeashoreC ECarterE AFarnumE CSeisR W, 1908“The effect of practice on normal illusions”Psychological Review Monograph Supplement9103–148
61.
ToppinoT CLongG M, 1987“Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don't change that channel”Perception & Psychophysics4237–48
62.
UnderwoodB J, 1951“Studies of distributed practice: II. Learning and retention of paired-adjective lists with two levels of intralist similarity”Journal of Experimental Psychology42153–161
63.
VirsuV, 1971“Tendencies to eye movement and misperception of curvature, direction and length”Perception & Psychophysics965–72
64.
WundtW, 1887“Die geometrisch-optischen Täuschungen”Akademie der Sächsischen Wissenschaften Leipzig, Abhandlungen2453–178
65.
YarbusA L, 1967Eye Movements and Vision translated by HaigB (New York: Plenum Press)
66.
ZhangH CSchianoD J, 1984“Experimental studies of assimilation and contrast illusions”Acta Psychologica Sinica1634–41
