Bartel's geometric restitution of perspective is explained and illustrated by application to two well-known works of art. Applications of the methods of Bartel and others are briefly discussed.
BartelK, 1958Perspektywa MalarskaVolume 2 (Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe)
3.
Der$gowskiJ B, 1986“Kazimierz Bartel's observations on drawings of children and illiterate adults”British Journal of Developmental Psychology4323–330
4.
Der$gowskiJ BBentleyA M, 1988“Distance constancy in Bushmen: An exploratory study” in Indigenous Cognition: Functioning in Cultural Context Eds BerryJ WIrvineS HHuntE B (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff) pp 177–185
5.
ten DoesschateG, 1964Perspective Fundamentals, Controversial, History (Nieuwkoop: B De Graaf)
6.
DuberyFWillatsJ, 1983Perspective and Other Drawing Systems (London: The Herbert Press)
7.
GregoryR L, 1973“The confounded eye” in Illusion in Nature and Art Eds GregoryR LGombrichE M (London: Duckworth) pp 49–96
8.
KempM, 1984“Construction and cunning: The perspective of the Edinburgh Saenredam” in Dutch Church Painters: Saenredam's ‘Great Church at Haarlem’ in Context Ed. National Gallery of Scotland (Edinburgh: The National Galleries of Scotland) pp 30–37
9.
KolbuszewskiJ, 1953“The significance of perspective in painting”Journal of the Royal Society of Arts101375–378
10.
PirenneM H, 1970Optics, Painting and Photography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
