A solid (ie filled-in) two-dimensional form is seen in motion toward another solid object of different shape and not towards an outline object of the same shape. The interpretation of these findings in terms of luminance-domain spatial frequency filtering is challenged by experiments in which the same results were obtained with kinetic and cyclopean forms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttneaveF, 1974“Apparent movement and the what—where connection”Psychologia17108–120
2.
BraddickO J, 1974“A short range process in apparent motion”Vision Research14519–528
3.
JuleszB, 1971Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
4.
KolersP, 1972Aspect of Motion Perception (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
5.
NavonD, 1976“Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology2130–138
6.
NeuhausW, 1930“Experimentelle Untersuchung der Scheinbewegung”Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie75315–418
7.
RamachandranV SGinsburgAAnstisS M, 1983“Low spatial frequencies dominate apparent motion”Perception12457–461
8.
UllmanS, 1980“The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion”Perception9617–626
