It is hypothesized that a figure with sides and angles in complex ratios (that is, other than 1:1) makes an aesthetic impression only when the complex ratios entail simple ones. An experiment is reported in which twelve pairs of line drawings were presented in which one drawing (A) always contained one or more 1:1 ratios, whereas in the other drawing (B) such simple ratios could not be indicated. In seven pairs the A pattern was preferred significantly. In this context, the alleged aesthetic appeal of the golden section is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnheimR, 1954Art and Visual Perception (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
2.
BerlyneD, 1971Aesthetics and Psychobiology (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)
3.
BouleauC, 1963The Painter's Secret Geometry. A Study of Composition in Art (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World)
4.
BuffartHLeeuwenbergERestleF, 1981“Coding theory of visual pattern completion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7241–274
5.
FechnerG, 1876Vorschule der Ästhetik (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel)
6.
HuntleyH E, 1970The Divine Proportion. A Study in Mathematical Beauty (New York: Dover)
7.
LeeuwenbergE, 1971“A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns”American Journal of Psychology84307–354
8.
McManusI C, 1980“The aesthetics of simple figures”British Journal of Psychology71505–524
9.
von Naredi-RainerP, 1982Architektur und Harmonie. Zahl, Mass und Proportion in der abendländischen Baukunst (Köln: Dumont)
10.
PiagetJ, 1961Les Mécanismes Perceptifs (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)
11.
PlugC, 1980“The golden section hypothesis”American Journal of Psychology93467–487
12.
RestleF, 1982“Coding theory as an integration of Gestalt psychology and information processing theory” in Organization and Representation in Perception Ed. BeckJ (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 31–56
