Because the perception of waveforms has been relatively neglected in vision research, one phenomenon of waveform perception, the parsing of waves into peak-shaped rather than trough-shaped segments, is examined. It is suggested that this so-called ‘peak preference’ is a grouping rule which can determine figure—background segregation in some circumstances. It appears to resist explanation in terms of the spatial-filtering properties of the visual system. For a complete explanation of peak preference, the ecological significance for actions that wave stimuli would normally have in the natural setting has to be considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnheimR, 1969Visual Thinking (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
2.
BiotM A, 1965Mechanics of Incremental Deformations (New York: John Wiley)
3.
CampbellF WRobsonJ G, 1968“Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings”Journal of Physiology197551–566
4.
ChadwickP K, 1972“Linkages between geology and psychology” contribution to colloquium, Bristol, England
5.
ChadwickP K, 1975a“A psychological analysis of observation in geology”Nature (London)256570–573
6.
ChadwickP K, 1975b“The psychology of geological observations”New Scientist68728–732
7.
ChadwickP K, 1976“Visual illusions in geology”Nature (London)260397–401
8.
ChadwickP K, 1982“Earth boundedness in geological observation”Journal of the Association of Geology Teachers716–22
9.
CookR M, 1972Greek Art, Its Development, Character and Influence (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson)
10.
DelboeufM J, 1865“Note sur certaines illusions d'optique”Bulletin de l'Academie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres, et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique 2me Serie 19195–216
11.
FleutyM J, 1970“What is a fold limb? contribution to colloqium “The study of folds”Imperial College, University of London, London, December
12.
GhentL, 1961“Form and its orientation—a child's eye view”American Journal of Psychology74177–190
13.
GinsburgA P, 1978Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data AMRL-TR-78-129 volumes I and II, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA
14.
GirgusJ SCorenS, 1975“Depth cues and constancy scaling in the horizontal—vertical illusion: The bisection error”Canadian Journal of Psychology2959–65
15.
HochbergJ, 1974“Organisation and the Gestalt tradition in Handbook of Perception volume I Historical and Philosophical Roots of Perception Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (London: Academic Press)
16.
HudlestonP J, 1973“An analysis of single layer folds developed experimentally in viscous media”Tectonophysics16189–214
17.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Henley-on-Thames, Oxon: Routledge and Kegan Paul)
18.
MarcO, 1977Psychology of the House (London: Thames and Hudson)
19.
NatsoulasT, 1967“What are perceptual reports about?”Psychological Bulletin67249–272
20.
ReadJ, 1979Henry Moore: Portrait of an Artist (London: Whizzard Press)
21.
SutherlandN S, 1957“Visual discrimination of orientation and shape by the octopus”Nature (London)17911–13
22.
SutherlandN S, 1973“Object recognition” in Handbook of Perception volume III. Biology of Perceptual Systems Eds CarteretteE CFiedmanM P (London: Academic Press)
23.
TakalaM, 1951“Asymmetries of visual space”Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae Series B72175
24.
WertheimerM, 1923“Untersuchung zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II”Psychologische Forschung4301–350
25.
WertheimerM, 1959Productive Thinking (New York: Harper and Row)
