A configuration is presented in which both the overestimated and the underestimated portions of the Müller-Lyer illusion are embedded. In free viewing no distortion of length occurs; however, overestimation or underestimation illusions can be produced by simple manipulation of the attentional set, thus demonstrating one cognitive component in the formation of the Müller-Lyer distortion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Von BékésyG, 1967Sensory Inhibition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
2.
BlakemoreCCarpenterR H SGeorgesonM A, 1970, “Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system”Nature (London)22837–39.
3.
BurnsB DPritchardR, 1971, “Geometrical illusions and the response of neurons in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns”Journal of Physiology (London)213599–616.
4.
CorenS, 1969, “The influence of optical aberrations on the magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion”Perception & Psychophysics6185–186.
5.
CorenS, 1970, “Lateral inhibition and geometric illusions”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology22274–278.
6.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1972a, “Differentiation and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics12466–470.
7.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1972b, “Illusion decrement in intersecting line figures”Psychonomic Science26108–110.
8.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1974, “Transfer of illusion decrement as a function of perceived similarity”Journal of Experimental Psychology102881–887.
9.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1977, “Illusions and constancies” in Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception: Mechanisms and Processes Ed. EpsteinW (New York: John Wiley)
10.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1978Seeing is Deceiving: The Psychology of Visual Illusions (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
11.
CorenSMillerJ, 1974, “Size contrast as a function of figural similarity”Perception & Psychophysics16355–357.
12.
CorenSPoracC, 1978, “Iris pigmentation and visual-geometric illusions”Perception7473–478.
13.
CorenSWardL M, 1979, “Levels of processing in visual illusions: The combination and interaction of distortion-producing mechanisms”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5324–335.
14.
CorenSWardL MPoracCFraserR, 1978, “The effect of optical blur on visual-geometric illusions”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society11390–392.
15.
DewarR E, 1968, “Distribution of practice and the Müller-Lyer illusion”Perception & Psychophysics3246–248.
16.
ErlebacherASekulerR, 1969, “Explanation of the Müller-Lyer illusion: Confusion theory examined”Journal of Experimental Psychology (London)80462–467.
17.
GillamB A, 1971, “A depth processing theory of the Poggendorff illusion”Perception & Psychophysics10211–216.
18.
GinsburgA P, 1971, “Psychological correlates of a model of the human visual system”Proceedings, 1971 National Aerospace Electronics Conference (NAECON), Dayton, Ohio pp 283–290.
19.
GirgusJ SCorenSDurantMPoracC, 1975, “The assessment of components involved in illusion formation using a long term decrement procedure”Perception & Psychophysics18144–148.
20.
GregoryR L, 1966, “Visual illusions” in New Horizons in Psychology Ed. FossB (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books) pp 68–96.
21.
GregoryR LHarrisJ P, 1975“Illusion-destruction by appropriate scaling”Perception4203–220.
22.
MassaroD WAndersonN H, 1971, “Judgemental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion”Journal of Experimental Psychology81147–151.
PresseyA W, 1974, “Evidence for the role of attentive fields in the perception of illusions”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology26464–471.
25.
RestleFDeckerJ, 1977, “Size of the Müller-Lyer illusion as a function of its dimensions: Theory and data”Perception & Psychophysics21489–503.
26.
RobinsonJ O, 1972The Psychology of Visual Illusions (London: Hutchinson).
27.
StuartG WDayR H, 1980, “The effect of blurring on intersecting line illusions”Perception9537–548.
28.
WardL MCorenS, 1976, “The effect of optically induced blur on the magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society7483–484.
29.
WardL MPoracCCorenSGirgusJ S, 1977, “The case for misapplied constancy scaling: Depth associations elicited by illusion configurations”American Journal of Psychology90609–620.
