It is argued that correspondence strength is a joint function of the relative activity of short-range and long-range processes and not solely a function of a single correspondence process, and this puts Ullman's interpretation of his results in doubt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnstisS M, 1978“Apparent movement” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology volume VIII Perception Eds HeldRLeibowitzHTeuberH-L (New York: Springer) pp 655–673.
2.
BraddickO J, 1974“A short-range process in apparent movement”Vision Research14519–527
3.
BraddickO JAdlardA, 1978“Apparent motion and the motion detector” in Visual Psychophysics and Physiology Eds ArmingtonJKrauskopfJWootenB (New York: Academic Press).
4.
PantleA JPetersikJ T, 1980“Effects of spatial parameters on the perceptual organization of a bistable motion display”Perception & Psychophysics27307–312.
5.
PantleA JPiccianoL, 1976“A multistable movement display: Evidence for separate motion systems in human vision”Science193500–502.
6.
PetersikJ TGrassmuckJ, 1981“High fundamental spatial frequencies and edges have different perceptual consequences in the ‘group/end-to-end’ movement phenomenon”Perception10375–382.
7.
PetersikJ TPantleA J, 1979“Factors controlling the competing sensations produced by a bistable stroboscopic motion display”Vision Research19143–154.
8.
UllmanS, 1979The Interpretation of Visual Motion (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
9.
UllmanS, 1980“The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion”Perception9617–626.
