Subjects were exposed to an optical rotation of visual reafferences from hand movements. This is known to produce visuomotor adaptation. An experiment is reported where it also induced a perceptual aftereffect measured as a displacement of the apparent vertical and as an ocular cyclotorsion, both in the direction of the optical rotation. No correlation could be found between the two phenomena which can be considered as independent adaptive responses to the visuomotor conflict.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CraskeB, 1967“Adaptation to prisms: Change in internally registered eye position”British Journal of Psychology58329–335.
2.
CroneR A, 1975“Optically induced eye torsion. II. Optostatic and optokinetic cycloversion”Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie1961–7.
3.
FinkeR AHeldR, 1978“State reversals of optically induced tilt and torsional eye movements”Perception & Psychophysics23337–340.
4.
FiorentiniAGhezCMaffeiL, 1972“Physiological correlates of adaptation to a rotated visual field”Journal of Physiology227313–322.
5.
GibsonJ J, 1937“Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines”Journal of Experimental Psychology20553–569.
6.
GoodenoughD RSigmanEOltmanP KRossoJMertzH, 1979“Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus”Vision Research191177–1179.
7.
HeldRRekoshJ, 1963“Motor-sensory feedback and the geometry of visual space”Science141722–723.
8.
HowardI PEvansJ A, 1963“The measurement of eye torsion”Vision Research3447–455.
9.
HowardI PTempletonW B, 1964“Visually-induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation”Vision Research4433–437.
10.
KalilR EFreedmanS J, 1966“Persistence of ocular rotation following compensation for displaced vision”Perceptual and Motor Skills22135–139.
11.
McIntyreC WPickH L, 1974“Transfer of adaptation to rotation of the visual field”Journal of Experimental Psychology103782–791.
12.
MikaelianHHeldR, 1964“Two types of adaptation to an optically rotated visual field”American Journal of Psychology77257–263.
13.
MorantR BAronoffJ, 1966“Starting position, adaptation, and visual framework as influencing the perception of verticality”Journal of Experimental Psychology71684–686.
14.
PrablancCTzavarasAJeannerodM, 1975“Adaptation of hand tracking to rotated visual coordinates”Perception & Psychophysics17325–328.
15.
SchneiderC W, 1966“Monocular and binocular perception of verticality and the relationship of ocular dominance”American Journal of Psychology79632–636.
16.
SingerGDayR H, 1966“Spatial adaptation and after-effect with optically transformed vision: Effects of active and passive responding and the relationship between test and exposure responses”Journal of Experimental Psychology71725–731.
17.
WernerHWapnerS, 1952“Towards a general theory of perception”Psychological Reviews59324–338.