Surfaces possessing steep variations in depth present severe difficulties for orientationally tuned filter models of stereopsis. These difficulties are discussed in connection with a random-dot stereogram depicting a surface with steep horizontal corrugations. As expected on theoretical grounds, we find that a vertical ±45° orientationally filtered version of this stereogram cannot be fused. Moreover, it is demonstrated that a horizontal ±45° filtered version can be fused only with difficulty and its stereo percept is poor compared to that of the unfiltered original. It is concluded that orientated filters seem ill-designed to mediate the extraction of disparity cues, at least in the cases under consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarlowH BBlakemoreCPettigrewJ D, 1967“The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination”Journal of Physiology (London)193327–342.
2.
BlakemoreC, 1970“The representation of three-dimensional visual space in the cat's striate cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)209155–178.
3.
BlakemoreCFiorentiniAMaffeiL, 1972“A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination”Journal of Physiology (London)226725–749.
4.
ClarkeP G HWhitteridgeD, 1973“The basis of stereoscopic vision in sheep”Journal of Physiology (London)22922P.
5.
FrisbyJ PMayhewJ E W, 1976“Global processes in stereopsis: Some comments on Ramachandran and Nelson (1976)”Perception6195–206.
6.
FrisbyJ PMayhewJ E W, 1978“The contrast sensitivity function for stereopsis”Perception7423–429.
7.
FrisbyJ PMayhewJ E W, 1980“Spatial frequency tuned channels: Implications for structure and function from psychophysical and computational studies of stereopsis” in The Psychology of Vision Eds Longuet-HigginsCSutherlandN S Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B (to be published).
8.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1970“Stereopsis vision in the macaque monkey”Nature (London)22541–42.
9.
JoshuaD EBishopP O, 1970“Binocular single vision and depth discrimination. Receptive field disparities for central and peripheral vision and binocular interaction of peripheral single units in cat striate cortex”Experimental Brain Research10389–416.
10.
JuleszB, 1965“Some neurophysiological problems of stereopsis” in Proceedings of Symposium on Information Processing in Sight Sensory Systems Ed. NyeP W, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1–3 November 1965, pp 135–142.
11.
JuleszBMillerJ, 1975“Independent spatial-frequency-tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry”Perception4125–143.
12.
MarrD, 1976“Early processing of visual information”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B275483–524.
13.
MarrDPoggioT, 1976“Co-operative computation of stereo disparity”Science194283–287.
14.
MarrDPoggioT, 1978“From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry”Neuroscience Research Progress Bulletin15(3) 470–488.
15.
MarrDPoggioT, 1979“A computational theory of human stereo vision”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B204301–328.
16.
MayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1976“Rivalrous texture stereograms”Nature (London)26453–56.
17.
MayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1978a“Stereopsis masking in humans is not orientationally tuned”Perception7431–436.
18.
MayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1978b“Contrast summation effects and stereopsis”Perception7537–550.
19.
MayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1980“The computation of binocular edges” (submitted to Perception).
20.
PettigrewJ DKonishiM, 1976“Effect of monocular deprivation on binocular neurons in owls' visual wulst”Nature (London)264753–754.
21.
PoggioG FFischerB, 1977“Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey”Journal of Neurophysiology401392–1405.
22.
TylerC W, 1974“Depth perception in disparity gratings”Nature (London)251140–142.
