Selective adaptation was used to explore the characteristics of a metacontrast masking stimulus which contribute to its effectiveness in masking the test stimulus. Subjects adapted for 10 s to a configuration like the masking stimulus that was either continuously on or flickering. Following this they viewed a metacontrast presentation and estimated the brightness of the test stimulus. Prior adaptation to a continuously present stimulus did not appreciably affect metacontrast masking; however, masking was greatly reduced following adaptation to flickering stimuli. These results are consistent with recent models of metacontrast masking based on transient and sustained visual channels.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpernM, 1953“Metacontrast”Journal of the Optical Society of America43648–657
2.
BowenR WPokornyJCacciatoD, 1977“Metacontrast masking depends on luminance transients”Vision Research17971–975
3.
BreitmeyerB G, 1975“Predictions of U-shaped backward pattern masking from considerations of the spatio-temporal frequency response”Perception4297–304
4.
BreitmeyerB GGanzL, 1976“Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing”Psychological Review831–36
5.
ClelandB GLevickW RSandersonK J, 1973“Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina”Journal of Physiology (London)228649–680
6.
DowB M, 1974“Functional classes of cells and their laminar distribution in monkey visual cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology37927–946
7.
Enroth-CugellCRobsonJ G, 1966“The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat”Journal of Physiology (London)187517–552
8.
GrowneyR LWeissteinN, 1972“Spatial characteristics of metacontrast”Journal of the Optical Society of America62690–696
9.
KulikowskiJ JTolhurstD J, 1973“Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient neurons in the human visual system”Journal of Physiology (London)232149–162
10.
MacleodD I A, 1978“Visual sensitivity”Annual Review of Psychology29613–645
PetryS, 1978“Perceptual changes during metacontrast”Vision Research181337–1341
13.
SingerWBedworthN, 1973“Inhibitory interaction between X and Y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus”Brain Research49291–307
14.
StevensS S, 1957“On the psychophysical law”Psychological Review64153–181
15.
StoneJDreherB, 1973“Projection of x- and y-cells of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to areas 17 and 18 of visual cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology36551–567
16.
TolhurstD J, 1973“Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus”Journal of Physiology (London)231385–402
17.
TylerC W, 1975“Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity: Two components in flicker perception”Vision Research15843–848
18.
WeissteinNGrowneyR L, 1969“Apparent movement and metacontrast: A note on Kahneman's formulation”Perception and Psychophysics5321–328
19.
WeissteinNOzocGSzocR, 1975“A comparison and elaboration of two models of metacontrast”Psychological Review82325–343
