The Münsterberg illusion is a compelling phenomenon for which there is no generally accepted explanation. It is suggested that two different contour-shifting effects operate in this illusion, and these are named the ‘symmetrical effect’ and the ‘corner effect’ respectively. It is further suggested that both of these effects are caused by ‘irradiation’, and an attempt is made to cast some light upon the phenomenon of irradiation, which is itself only poorly understood.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnstisS MComerfordJ P, 1975“A simple method of projecting Mach bands, colour mixtures, and variable contrast sinusoidal gratings”Behaviour Research Methods and Instrumentation7283–287
2.
von BékésyG, 1967Sensory Inhibition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
3.
BrignerW LGallagherM B, 1974“Subjective contour: apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?”Perceptual and Motor Skills381047–1053
4.
ByramG M, 1944“The physical and photochemical basis of visual resolving power. II. Visual acuity and the photochemistry of the retina”Journal of the Optical Society of America34718–738
5.
CarpenterR H SBlakemoreC, 1973“Interactions between orientations in human vision”Experimental Brain Research18287–303
6.
CornsweetT N, 1970Visual Perception (New York: Academic Press)
7.
FiorentiniARadiciT, 1958“Brightness, width and position of Mach bands as a function of the rate of variation of a luminance gradient”Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi13145–155
8.
FlamantF, 1955“Repartition dans l'image retinienne d'une fente”Revue d'Optique34433–453
9.
FraserJ, 1908“A new visual illusion of direction”British Journal of Psychology2307–320
10.
GlezerV D, 1965“The receptive fields of the retina”Vision Research5497–525
11.
GregoryR L, 1977“Vision with isoluminant colour contrast: 1. A projection technique and observations”Perception6113–119
12.
von HelmholtzH, 1856Handbuch der Physiologischen Optikvolume II (Leipzig: Voss)
13.
van HeuvenJ A, 1926“A method for measuring simultaneous contrast”British Journal of Psychology17127–141
14.
KrauskopfJ, 1962“Light distribution in human retinal images”Journal of the Optical Society of America521046–1050
15.
MünsterbergH, 1897“Die verschobene Schachbrettfigur”Zeitschrift für Psychologie15184–188
16.
OyamaT, 1975“Determinants of the Zöllner illusion”Psychological Research37261–280
17.
PierceH, 1898“The illusion of the kindergarten patterns”Psychological Review5233–253
18.
Plateau, 1838“Memoire sur l'irradiation”Nouveaux Mémoires de l'Academie de Bruxelles T XI (Poggendorffs Annalen Ergänzungsband I.S. 79 193, 405)
19.
RobinsonJ O, 1972The Psychology of Visual Illusion (London: Hutchinson)
20.
ShipleyTWierC, 1972“Asymmetries in the Machband pheneomenon”Kybernetik10181–188
21.
WallaceG K, 1969“The critical distance of interaction in the Zöllner illusion”Perception and Psychophysics5261–264
22.
WallaceG KCrampinD J, 1969“The effect of background density on the Zöllner illusion”Vision Research9167–177
23.
WallaceG KMouldenB P, 1973“The effect of body tilt on the Zöllner illusion”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology2510–21
24.
WestheimerGCampbellF W, 1962“Light distribution in the image formed by the living human eye”Journal of the Optical Society of America521040–1045
25.
WhitesideJ ADavidsonM L, 1971“Symmetrical appearance of bright and dark Mach bands from an exponential illumination gradient”Journal of the Optical Society of America61958–961
26.
WilcoxW W, 1932“The basis of the dependence of visual acuity on illumination”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA1847–56
