Recent discoveries of nonlinear perceptual analyzers in effortless texture discrimination cast serious doubt on the usefulness of Fourier image decompositions to describe suprathreshold visual-texture perception. We now explain the meaning of these results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlakemoreCCampbellF W, 1969“On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images”Journal of Physiology (London)203237–260
CaelliT MJuleszBGilbertE N, 1978“On perceptual analyzers underlying visual texture discrimination: Part II”Biological Cybernetics29201–214.
4.
GrahamNNachmiasJ, 1971“Detecting of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies”Vision Research11251–261.
5.
HarmonL DJuleszB, 1973“Masking in visual recognition: Effects of two-dimensional filtered noise”Science1801194–1197.
6.
JuleszB, 1962“Visual pattern discrimination”IRE Transactions on Information Theory884–92.
7.
JuleszB, 1975“Experiments in the visual perception of texture”Scientific American232(4) 34–43.
8.
JuleszBGilbertE NSheppL AFrischH L, 1973“Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics—revisited”Perception2391–405.
9.
JuleszBGilbertE NVictorJ D, 1978“Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics”Biological Cybernetics31137–140.
10.
JuleszBMillerJ, 1975“Independent spatial-frequency-tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry”Perception4125–143.
11.
PantleASekulerR, 1968“Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision”Science1621146–1148.
12.
StromeyerC FIIIJuleszB, 1972“Spatial frequency masking in vision: Critical bands and spread of masking”Journal of the Optical Society of America621221–1232.
13.
UttalWR, 1975An Autocorrelation Theory of Form Detection (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
14.
VolterraV, 1930The Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations (London: Blackie).
15.
WienerN, 1958Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory (New York: John Wiley)