Counterphase gratings, and several other stimuli which consist of equal components of motion in both directions, appeared to drift foveofugally, rather than foveopetally, when presented to the retinal periphery. This ‘foveofugal drift effect’ was demonstrated by descriptive and nulling techniques and its magnitude was shown to vary across subjects. The effect was fairly brief under continuous fixation. Several lines of evidence suggested that eye movements were not responsible for the effect. The phenomenon implies a directional asymmetry in the human visual system which may be related to our consistent exposure to expanding patterns of visual flow.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnisR CFrostB, 1973“Human visual ecology and orientation anisotropics in acuity”Science182729–731
2.
BraunsteinM L, 1966“Sensitivity of the observer to transformations of the visual field”Journal of Experimental Psychology72683–689
3.
BraunsteinM L, 1968“Motion and texture as sources of slant information”Journal of Experimental Psychology78247–253
4.
CampbellF WGreenD G, 1965“Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution”Journal of Physiology181576–593
5.
CynaderMBermanNHeinA, 1975“Cats reared in a one-directional world: effects on receptive fields in visual cortex and superior colliculus”Experimental Brain Research22267–280
6.
CynaderMChernenkoG, 1976“Abolition of directional selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat”Science193504–505
7.
GibsonJ J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)
8.
GibsonJ J, 1954“The visual perception of objective and subjective movement”Psychological Review61304–314
9.
GibsonJ J, 1958“Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals”British Journal of Psychology68372–385
10.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)
11.
Hartley JonesM, 1973“Frequency shifter for howl suppression”Wireless World79317–322
12.
LevinsonESekulerR, 1975“The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement”Journal of Physiology (London)250347–366
13.
LishmanJ RLeeD N, 1973“The autonomy of visual kinaesthesis”Perception2287–294
14.
MurphyB JKowlerESteinmanR M, 1975“Slow oculomotor control in the presence of moving backgrounds”Vision Research151263–1268
15.
PettigrewJ D, 1974“The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones”Journal of Physiology (London)23749–74
16.
RichardsW, 1975“Visual space perception” in Handbook of Perception volume 5 Seeing Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (London: Academic Press) pp 351–381
17.
SchadeH, 1956“Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye”Journal of the Optical Society of America46721–739
18.
ScottT RLavenderA DMcWhirtR APowellD A, 1966“Directional asymmetry of motion aftereffect”Journal of Experimental Psychology71806–815
19.
SingerW, 1976“Modification of orientation and direction selectivity of cortical cells in kittens with monocular vision”Brain Research118460–468
20.
TimneyB NMuirD W, 1976“Orientation anisotropy: incidence and magnitude of Caucasian and Chinese subjects”Science193699–700
21.
TretterFCynaderMSingerW, 1975“Modification of directional selectivity of neurones in the visual cortex of kittens”Brain Research84143–149
22.
WarrenR, 1976“The perception of egomotion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2448–456
23.
WohlgemuthA, 1911“On the aftereffect of seen movement”British Journal of Psychology, MonographSupplement 11–117
