The decay of several visual aftereffects may be prolonged by interposing a period of light-free or pattern-free viewing between adaptation and testing. We demonstrate that this storage phenomenon can be observed using the threshold elevation aftereffect that follows inspection of a high-contrast grating pattern. Control experiments comparing thresholds for vertical and horizontal gratings after adaptation to a vertical grating reveal that the stored aftereffect, like its unstored counterpart, is pattern-selective. Storage is equally pronounced with stimuli that are detected by pattern-analyzing or movement-analyzing visual channels. Unlike other aftereffects, the threshold-elevation aftereffect requires that the storage period be light-free; no storage is seen if a blank field is inspected between adaptation and testing. The results are discussed with respect to the nature of visual aftereffects, and possible cognitive or physiological models of storage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarlowH BHillR M, 1963“Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural aftereffects”Nature (London)2001345–1347
2.
BlakemoreCCampbellF W, 1969a“Adaptation to spatial stimuli”Journal of Physiology (London)20011P–13P
3.
BlakemoreCCampbellF W, 1969b“On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images”Journal of Physiology (London)203203–260
4.
BlakemoreCMunceyJ P JRidleyR M, 1973“Stimulus specificity in the human visual system”Vision Research131915–1931
5.
BlakemoreCNachmiasJ, 1971“The orientation specificity of two visual aftereffects”Journal of Physiology (London)213157–174
6.
BlakemoreCNachmiasJSuttonP, 1970“The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency-selective neurones in the human brain”Journal of Physiology (London)210727–750
7.
CampbellF WClelandB GCooperG FEnroth-CugellC, 1968“The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings”Journal of Physiology (London)198237–250
8.
CampbellF WCooperG FEnroth-CugellC, 1969“The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat”Journal of Physiology (London)203223–235
9.
CampbellF WGreenD G, 1965“Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution”Journal of Physiology (London)181576–593
10.
CampbellF WMaffeiL, 1971“The tilt aftereffect: a fresh look”Vision Research11833–840
11.
DealyR STolhurstD J, 1974“Is spatial adaptation an aftereffect of prolonged inhibition?”Journal of Physiology (London)241261–270
12.
ExnerS, 1888“Einige Beobachtungen über Bewegungsnachbilder”Zentralblatt für Physiologie1135–140
13.
GibsonJ JRadnerM, 1937“Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies”Journal of Experimental Psychology20453–467
14.
GilinskyA S, 1968“Orientation specific effects of patterns of adapting light on visual acuity”Journal of the Optical Society of America5813–18
15.
HeggelundPHohmannA, 1976“Long-term retention of the ‘Gilinsky-effect’”Vision Research161015–1017
16.
HonigW K, 1967“Studies of the storage of the after-effect of seen movement” paper presented to the Psychonomics Society, Chicago, 111
17.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1962“Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)160106–154
18.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1968“Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)195215–243
19.
JonesP DHoldingD H, 1976“Extremely long-term persistence of the McCollough effect”Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance1323–327
20.
KulikowskiJ JTolhurstD J, 1973“Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision”Journal of Physiology (London)232149–162
21.
McColloughC, 1965“Color adaptation of edge detectors in the human visual system”Science1491115–1116
22.
MacKayD MMacKayV, 1975“What causes decay of pattern-contingent chromatic aftereffects?”Vision Research15462–464
23.
MaffeiLFiorentiniABistiS, 1973“Neural correlate of perceptual adaptation to gratings”Science1821036–1038
MayhewJ E WAnstisS M, 1972“Movement aftereffects contingent on color, intensity and pattern”Perception and Psychophysics1277–85
26.
MovshonJ ABlakemoreC, 1973“Orientation specificity and spatial selectivity in human vision”Perception253–60
27.
PantleA JSekulerR W, 1968“Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision”Science1621146–1148
28.
PurkinjeJ, 1825 cited in Wohlgemuth (1911)
29.
RobsonJ G, 1966“Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of the visual system”Journal of the Optical Society of America561141–1142
30.
SchadeO H, 1956“Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye”Journal of the Optical Society of America46721–739
31.
SkowboDGentryTTimneyBMorantR B, 1974“The McCollough effect: influence of several kinds of visual stimulation on decay rate”Perception and Psychophysics1647–49
32.
SpigelI M, 1960“The effects of differential post-exposure illumination on the decay of a movement aftereffect”Journal of Psychology50209–210
33.
SpigelI M, 1962“Contour absence as a critical factor in the inhibition of the decay of a movement aftereffect”Journal of Psychology54221–228
34.
ThompsonP G, 1976“Velocity aftereffects and the perception of movement” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, England
35.
ThompsonP GMovshonJ A, 1975“Storage of the threshold elevation aftereffect” paper presented to the Experimental Psychology Society, Oxford, April
36.
TolhurstD J, 1973“Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and movement of a moving visual stimulus”Journal of Physiology (London)231385–402
37.
TolhurstD JSharpeC RHartG, 1973“The analysis of the drift rate of moving sinusoidal gratings”Vision Research132545–2555
38.
WohlgemuthA, 1911“On the aftereffect of seen movement”British Journal of Psychology MonographSupplement 11–117
