Metacontrast is assessed both by percent accuracy and by the dichotomous sensitivity and criterion measures of a signal-detection model in a forced-choice detection task. The results showed a monotonic increase in sensitivity with increasing mask delay, and an abrupt shift of subjects' response criterion at an 80 ms interstimulus interval. The results are discussed in terms of the interpretational advantages of a signal-detection approach to metacontrast investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernsteinJ HProctorJ DProctorR WSchurmanD L, 1973“Metacontrast and brightness discrimination”Perception and Psychophysics14293–297
2.
BernsteinJ JProctorR WBelcherJSchurmanD L, 1974“An analysis of U-shaped metacontrast”Perception and Psychophysics16329–336
3.
EganJ P, 1975Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis (New York: Academic Press)
4.
EriksenC WMarshallP H, 1969“Failure to replicate a reported U-shaped visual masking function”Psychonomic Science15195–196
5.
EriksenC WBeckerB BHoffmanJ E, 1970“Safari to masking land: A hunt for the elusive U”Perception and Psychophysics8245–250
6.
EstesW KStraughanJ H, 1954“Analysis of a verbal conditioning situation in terms of statistical learning theory”Journal of Experimental Psychology47225–234
7.
GreenD MSwetsJ A, 1966Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (New York: John Wiley)
8.
GrierJ B, 1971“Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas”Psychological Bulletin75424–429
9.
HodosW, 1970“Nonparametric index of response bias for use in detection and recognition experiments”Psychological Bulletin74351–354
10.
KahnemanD, 1968“Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking”Psychological Bulletin69404–425
11.
LeftonL A, 1973“Metacontrast: A review”Perception and Psychophysics13161–171 [originally published in Psychonomic Monograph Supplement 4 (whole number 62), 1972]
12.
PastoreR EScheirerC J, 1974“Signal detection theory: Considerations for general application”Psychological Bulletin81945–958
13.
PollackINormanD A, 1964“A nonparametric analysis of recognition experiments”Psychonomic Science1125–126
14.
SchillerP HSmithM C, 1966“Detection in metacontrast”Journal of Experimental Psychology7132–39
15.
SchurmanD L, 1972“Predictive validity of a Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Test of a model of masking for form”Perception and Psychophysics12183–186
16.
SchurmanD LEriksenC W, 1970“Summation and interaction of successive masking stimuli in visual perception”American Journal of Psychology82320–332
17.
SwetsJ ATannerW PJrBirdsallT G, 1961“Decision processes in perception”Psychological Review68301–340
18.
TitusT G, 1973“Continuous feedback in recognition memory”Perceptual and Motor Skills37771–776
19.
UttalW R, 1970“On the physiological basis of masking with dotted visual noise”Perception and Psychophysics1321–327
20.
WeissteinN A, 1968“A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Simulation of metacontrast”Psychological Review75494–521
