Using simple, single angular figures, including figures containing only one line, we have shown systematic misestimations of distance defined by these figures. These misestimations are not related to the absolute distance per se, but are related both to the size of the angle defining the distance, and to the part of the angle defining it. Some implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlakemoreC BCarpenterR H SGeorgesonM A, 1970“Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system”Nature (London)22837–39
2.
BoumaHAndriessenJ J, 1970“Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments”Vision Research10333–349
3.
BurnsB DPritchardR, 1971“Geometrical illusions and the response of neurons in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns”Journal of Physiology (London)213599–616
4.
CarpenterR H SBlakemoreC B, 1973“Interactions between orientations in human vision”Experimental Brain Research18287–303
5.
ChiangC, 1968“A new theory to explain geometrical illusions produced by crossing lines”Perception and Psychophysics3174–176
6.
RobinsonJ O, 1972The Psychology of Visual Illusion (London: Hutchinson)
