The Poggendorff illusion is one of the most exhaustively studied illusions. Can it be revived as an interesting problem? Perhaps by moving it to a slightly different domain. Here, we consider the occlusion of a subjectively linear ramp of tonal values. In a simple experiment, we find results closely resembling those of the geometrical Poggendorff. Yet, the “explanations” offered for the latter hardly apply to the former case. Depending upon one's perspective, this may be taken to “revive” the Poggendorff illusion.
GreeneE. (1988). The corner Poggendorff. Perception17, 65–70. doi:10.1068/p170065
7.
GreeneE.FisherJ. (1993). Classical illusion effects with nonclassic stimuli: Angular induction from decomposing lines into point arrays. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 575–589. doi:10.3758/BF03206953
8.
GreeneE.VerloopM. (1994). Anomalous and luminance contours produce similar angular induction effects. Perception, 23, 147–156. doi:10.1068/p230147
9.
HoweC. Q.YangZ.PurvesD. (2005). The Poggendorff illusion explained by natural scene geometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(21), 7707–7712. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502893102
10.
LucasA.FisherG. H. (1969). Illusions in concrete situations: II. Experimental studies of the Poggendorff illusion. Ergonomics, 12, 395–402. doi:10.1080/00140136908931063
11.
MasiniR.SciakyR.PascarellaA., (1992). The orientation of a parallel-line texture between the verticals can modify the strength of the Poggendorff illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 235–242. doi:10.3758/BF03209141
12.
PoultonE. C. (1985). Geometric illusions in reading graphs. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 543–548. doi:10.3758/BF03204920
ZöllnerF. (1860). Ueber eine neue Art von Pseudoskopie und ihre Beziehungen zu den von Plateau und Oppel beschrieben Bewegungsphaenomenen. Annalen der Physik, 186(7), 500–525. doi:10.1002/andp.18601860712
