In the well-known gamut expansion effect, uniformly coloured target patches are perceived as more colourful when they are embedded in a uniform grey surround than when they are embedded in a variegated one. Here, we provide a demonstration showing that this effect can be inverted when the uniformly coloured target patches are replaced by variegated ones. This observation suggests that the gamut expansion effect is due to mechanisms of transparency perception rather than due to contrast adaptation.
AdelsonE. H. (2000). Lightness perception and lightness illusion. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 339–351). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AndersonB. L. (In press). The perceptual representation of transparency, lightness, and gloss. In WagemansJ. (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BrownR. O.MacLeodD. I. A. (1997). Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors. Current Biology, 7, 844–849. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00372-1
4.
EkrollV.FaulF. (2012a). New laws of simultaneous contrast?Seeing and Perceiving, 25(2), 107–141. doi:10.1163/187847612X626363
5.
EkrollV.FaulF. (2012b). Basic characteristics of simultaneous color contrast revisited. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1246–1255. doi:10.1177/0956797612443369
6.
EkrollV.FaulF. (2013). Transparency perception: The key to understanding simultaneous color contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 30(3), 342–352. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.30.000342
7.
FaulF.EkrollV.WendtG. (2008). Colour appearance: The limited role of chromatic surround variance in the “gamut expansion effect.”Journal of Vision, 8(3), 30 (1–20). doi:10.1167/8.3.30
8.
FuchsW. (1923). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über das simultane Hintereinandersehen auf derselben Sehrichtung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 91, 145–235.
9.
GerbinoW. (In press). Achromatic transparency. In WagemansJ. (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
von HelmholtzH. (1866/1962). Treatise on physiological optics (vol. 2), translated by SouthallJ. P. L. (New York: Dover), pp. 264–301 [originally published as Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (1866, Leipzig: Voss)].
11.
KingdomF. A. A. (2003). Levels of brightness perception. In HarrisL.JenkinM. (Eds.), Levels of perception (pp. 23–46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
LottoR. B.PurvesD. (2000). An empirical explanation of color contrast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(23), 12834–12839. doi:10.1073/pnas.210369597
13.
MetelliF. (1985). Stimulation and perception of transparency. Psychological Research, 47(4), 185–202. doi:10.1007/BF00309446
14.
ShevellS. K. (1978). The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception. Vision Research, 18(12), 1649–1661. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90257-2
15.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM. (2012a). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333
16.
WagemansJ.FeldmanJ.GepshteinS.KimchiR.PomerantzJ. R.Van der HelmP. A.Van LeeuwenC. (2012b). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252. doi:10.1037/a0029334
17.
WalravenJ.BenzschawelTRogowitzB. R. (1987). Color constancy interpretation of chromatic induction. In RichterM. (Ed.), AIC proceedings “Stiles–Wyszcecki memorial symposium on color vision models” (pp. 269–273). Göttingen, BRD: Muster-Schmidt Verlag.
18.
WhittleP. (2002). Contrast colours: A powerful and disturbing phenomenon. In SaundersB.van BrakelJ. (Eds.). Theories, technologies, instrumentalities of color: Anthropological and historiographic perspectives (pp. 105–111). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
19.
WollschlägerD.AndersonB. L. (2009). The role of layered scene representations in color appearance. Current Biology, 19, 430–435. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.053
